A typical value chain (input-transformation-output) model for wine supply chain is provided in Figure 1 below. Describe how the value chain at Cameron Hughes differs from the one provided here?
How does Cameron Hughes positions its firm (and differentiate itself from other wine merchants)?
How does Cameron Hughes adds value in the wine industry? Could other winemakers do the same thing? Why / Why not?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZyVZi3e2J8Critical Thinking Rubric (1)Critical Thinking Rubric (1)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies and Summarizes issue at hand5 ptsIdentifies not only the basics of the issue, but recognizes nuances of the issue4 ptsIdentifies the main issue and subsidiary, embedded, or implicit aspects of the issue2 ptsDoes not identify and summarize the issue, is confused or identifies a different or inappropriate issue5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal and other salient perspectives and positions5 ptsAddresses and analyzes salient perspectives from experience and information from outside sources.4 ptsIdentifies, appropriately, one’s own position and/or other salient perspectives on the issue3 ptsAddress a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify presented position relative to one’s own and/or other salient perspective2 ptsFails to address even a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify presented position relative to one’s own and/or other salient perspective5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of evaluation and analysis5 ptsObserves cause and effect and addresses existing or potential consequences. Clearly distinguishes between fact, opinion, and acknowledges value judgments4 ptsExamines the evidence and source of evidence, questions its accuracy, precision, relevance, and completeness2 ptsMerely repeats information provided, taking it as truth or denies evidence without adequate justification5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusions, implications, and consequences5 ptsObjectively reflects upon own assertions4 ptsIdentifies and discusses conclusions, implications, and consequences3 ptsIdentifies and discusses conclusions, implications, and consequences but only superficially2 ptsFails to identify conclusions, implications, and consequences of the issue5 pts
Total Points: 20