Post A need at least 8 pages
Post B need at least 1 pages
Do not share this work to anyone or upload this work in any website
Check sample summary DOC 3, and copy the format.
Answer the question and stray from the point, step by steps
Read Doc1 first , do not miss anything or details. If you have any question or need anything please let me know
All work is needed write in right format and no errors in grammar, punctuation, word choice, spelling.
Do not use any real name or real company name, for all work you can use “A company” without a name (No need to introduce the company in detail) or use I have Internship in a company.
Do not use too many other resources, use your own words to finish this or change and rewrite it, do not share this work or upload it to any website, and it has to be your original work.
Answer from the perspective of students, only internship experience
The only resource you can use is The Six Sigma Way
Post A
The book name is The Six Sigma way (DOC 2)
General Instructions:
Times New Roman 12-point font and 1-inch margins following APA style. No title page is required. Do not include extra spacing between sections or paragraphs.
Write in complete sentences free of grammatical and typographical errors.
The only resources that are allowed for completing this assignment are (1) the book you chose to base the project on and (2) the course textbook and assigned articles or supplemental materials. Evidence of the use of any other resource in completing this assignment will result in zero credit for this assignment.
It is strongly recommended you use the provided template to complete this assignment.
Submit the executive summary portion of this project in the separate executive summary assignment.
Note. Although you will be offering a critique of your chosen book, you should not criticize the book or the author(s). Papers should maintain a professional and unbiased tone like the summaries we have been reading in your course textbook.
Check DOC 3 for format
A. Main Body
Introduction – recommended length: at least 4-5 sentences
Provide a brief introduction to your paper including the book you chose (title, author, year of publication), perhaps why you chose your particular book, and the topics that will be addressed in your paper.
Book Summary – recommended length: at least 1-2 pages
Identify the highlights of the book you chose. Summarize the book’s key points, main themes, and new ideas. You do not need to summarize every point made in the entire book. Select the key points.
Critical Analysis – This section should make up the bulk of your paper – about 5-6+ pages (refer to the “Critiquing These Popular Books” section on p. 8-9 of your text book for a more detailed explanation of the below criteria). Use any headings that make sense in the context of your paper.
Examine the source and basis for the book.
Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the author’s arguments.
Examine the quality of the data/database or experience upon which the book is developed, and other elements. Write a sentence or two addressing the above heading, and then move into the specific elements.
Thoroughly evaluate and assess, on a 10-point scale (1 = low, 10 = high) the below criteria (p. 9 of text book) and provide strong and consistent supporting arguments for each (Note. It is possible that not all of the above criteria will be applicable to your chosen book. If that is the case, you must still address all criteria and explain in your opinion why a particular criterion is not applicable. Rating each element on a scale of 1-10 is required for credit for each element.):
Author credentials and their relevance
Rationale
Face validity
Target audience/Identified market for the book
Author’s integration of existing knowledge
Readability/interest level
Internal validity
Reliability/Consistency
Distinctiveness
Objectivity
External validity
Practicality/ease of application
Integration – recommended length: 2.5-3 pages
Integrate the book with the course readings (the textbook and articles). Show where and how the ideas relate or where they are inconsistent to the other course readings. Stretch your mind a bit! This is your opportunity to really shine.
Conclusion – recommended length: at least 4-5 sentences.
Offer a brief review of what was discussed in the paper and closing thoughts.
Given the above analysis, how good is the book? Rate it on an overall 10-point scale. Explicitly explain how you reached your conclusion. How does your overall conclusion reflect your analysis? Would you recommend that your busy boss spend a weekend reading it?
B. Reference Page(s) in APA format
Note: Turnitin is enabled for this assignment. Any evidence of plagiarism will result in a zero on this assignment at a minimum.
At least 8pages
POST B
Check DOC4 for post B format
Formatting:
The full course project paper must be supplemented by a one-page (more than one page is okay), single-spaced “executive summary.”
Center the title of the project at the top of the page.
Content:
This is a standalone report that captures the essence of your analysis and conclusions.
It must be easy to read, and it may productively use “bulleted” items for space-saving conciseness.
This summary provides a quick synopsis or abstract of your paper including:
premise(s) [up to 20 points]
assumptions [up to 20 points]
arguments [up to 20 points]
highlights [up to 20 points]
major conclusions [up to 20 points]
You do not have to include a reference page because you will be providing that information in the full paper. You must include, at a minimum, the title [required for assignment credit] and author [required for assignment credit] of your book, however.
Grade Determination:
Starting point values are provided in brackets [ ] beside each associated item.
Deductions to starting score:
Use of outside sources (other than your chosen book and possibly the course textbook): automatic zero
Not writing in complete sentences: 10-point deduction per occurrence
Grammatical/typographical errors:
0-2: no deduction
3-5: 10-point deduction
more than 6: 30-point deduction
A. Reference Page: Required for Credit on Assignment:
Present? Yes (continue to rubric) No (grade = 0)
B. Starting Score Determination:
The possible point value for each required paper component is provided in the table below. Unless noted
otherwise, the grading anchors for each question component are as follows:
full credit (100%): Very thorough, in-depth discussion reflecting strong critical thinking (requires a
minimum of at least four substantive sentences); answers the question asked
partial credit (90%): Thorough, in-depth discussion reflecting strong critical thinking (requires a minimum
of at least four substantive sentences); answers the question asked
partial credit (80%): Somewhat thorough, in-depth discussion reflecting moderate critical thinking (requires
a minimum of at least three substantive sentences); answers the question asked
partial credit (70%): Minimally thorough discussion; answers question but reflects little critical thinking
(requires a minimum of at least three substantive sentences); answers the question asked
partial credit (60%): Surface-level discussion; no depth to response/discussion reflecting very little critical
thinking; answers the question asked
no credit (0%): Does not answer the question asked
Integration section: same anchor descriptions apply as above, but the length requirement increases:
full credit (100%): requires a minimum of at least 2.5-3.0 substantive pages
partial credit (90%): requires a minimum of at least 2.5-3.0 substantive pages
partial credit (80%): requires a minimum of at least 2.0-2.5 substantive pages
partial credit (70%): requires a minimum of at least 1.5-2.0 substantive pages
partial credit (60%): requires a minimum of at least 1.-1.5 substantive pages
no credit (0%): Does not answer the question asked
Note: If any of the below sub-components of the Book Summary or Critical Analysis sections are not applicable
to your chosen book, you must still address that component by explaining why, in your opinion, that component
does not apply. If that is the case, the grading anchors are slightly relaxed in terms of required sentences.
Paper Component Possible
Point Value
Score Comment
Introduction
Required components (book title, author, year
of publication) present? (score is based on
presence/absence of component)
6.0 (2.0
each)
Remaining portion of introduction 2.0
Book Summary
Book’s key points 4.0
Book’s main themes 4.0
Book’s new ideas 4.0
Critical Analysis
Source & basis for book 4.0
Strengths & weaknesses of authors arguments 4.0
Quality of data/database or experience upon
which the book is developed
1. Author credentials & their relevance* 3.5
2. Rationale* 3.5
3. Face validity* 3.5
4. Target audience/Identified market for the
book*
3.5
5. Author’s integration of existing knowledge* 3.5
6. Readability/interest level* 3.5
7. Internal validity* 3.5
8. Reliability/Consistency* 3.5
9. Distinctiveness* 3.5
10. Objectivity* 3.5
11. External Validity* 3.5
12. Practicality/ease of application* 3.5
Integration (See unique grading anchors) 20.00
Conclusion
Review of what discussed in paper 2.5
Closing thoughts 2.5
Given the above, how good is the book? Rate on
an overall 10-point scale.* Explicitly explain
how you reached your conclusion.
2.5
Would you recommend that your busy boss
spend a weekend reading it? Why?
2.5
Total Starting Score:
*Inclusion of your assessment of the criterion on a 10-point scale (1=low to 10=high) is required for credit
on this component.
C. Deductions to Starting Score (if any):
Component Deduction (out of 10 possible points on assignment) Points
Deducted
Use of outside sources (other than
approved sources):
Automatic zero
Evidence of plagiarism Automatic zero
Not writing in complete sentences 5-point deduction per occurrence
Grammatical/typographical errors 0-2: no deduction
3-5: 5-point deduction
6-7: 10-point deduction
8-9: 15-point deduction
More than 10: 20-point deduction
Total Points Deducted: