NR702 Project and Practicum I
Guided Worksheet: DNP Project Proposal Development
Week 6: Appendices
During the sixth week of NR702 you will finalize your DNP proposal and complete all the appendices related to this work. When you post this in the threads, it is acceptable to attach a Word Doc to the post after briefly listing the appendices you completed, due to the capabilities of this display in Canvas on the discussion board. Once you receive feedback from your faculty member, make all necessary changes and cut/paste the content of this worksheet 6 of the appendices into the “DNP Project Template”, which is found in “Resources”—“Project and Practicum Resources.” For NR 702, it is required to complete the Appendices. Appendix A is required (optional for NR 702), as you will begin to complete the evidence table in navigation, continue in NR 702 and then complete in NR 705 with your literature synthesis.
Directions for Use of the Individual Evidence Summary Tool
This table should be started in navigation, continued in NR 702, and completed in NR 705. There will be additional research added in NR 709.
Purpose
This form is used to document the results of evidence appraisal in preparation for evidence synthesis. The form provides the EBP team with documentation of the sources of evidence used, the year the evidence was published or otherwise communicated, the information gathered from each evidence source that helps the team answer the EBP question, and the level and quality of each source of evidence.
Article Number
Assign a number to each reviewed source of evidence. This organizes the individual evidence summary and provides an easy way to reference articles.
Author and Date
Indicate the last name of the first author or the evidence source and the publication/communication date. List both author/evidence source and date.
Evidence Type
Indicate the type of evidence reviewed (for example: RCT, meta-analysis, mixed methods, quaLitative, systematic review, case project, narrative literature review).
Sample, Sample Size, and Setting
Provide a quick view of the population, number of participants, and project location.
Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question
Although the reviewer may find many points of interest, list only findings that directly apply to the EBP question.
Observable Measures
QuaNtitative measures or variables are used to answer a research question, test a hypothesis, describe characteristics, or determine the effect, impact, or influence. QuaLitative evidence uses cases, context, opinions, experiences, and thoughts to represent the phenomenon of project.
Limitations
Include information that may or may not be within the text of the article regarding drawbacks of the piece of evidence. The evidence may list limitations, or it may be evident to you, as you review the evidence, that an important point is missed or the sample does not apply to the population of interest.
Evidence Level and Quality
Using information from the individual appraisal tools, transfer the evidence level and quality rating into this column.
Appendix A
Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice
Appendix G: Individual Evidence Summary Tool
The Johns Hopkins Hospital/The Johns Hopkins University
Practice Question: Among adult patients with type 2 diabetes at Cano Health (P), what is the impact of motivational interviewing through telemedicine (I) compared to current practice (C) on medication adherence (O) over 8-10 weeks (T)”?
Date:
Article Number
Author and Date
Evidence Type
Sample, Sample Size, Setting
Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question
Observable Measures
Limitations
Evidence Level, Quality
Attach a reference list with full citations of articles reviewed for this Practice question. The Johns Hopkins Hospital/ The Johns Hopkins University
References
Andrès, E., Meyer, L., Zulfiqar, A. A., Hajjam, M., Talha, S., Bahougne, T., … & El Hassani, A. H. (2019). Telemonitoring in diabetes: evolution of concepts and technologies, with a focus on results of the more recent studies. Journal of medicine and life, 12(3), 203.
Bingham, J. M., Black, M., Anderson, E. J., Li, Y., Toselli, N., Fox, S., Martin, J. R., Axon, D. R., & Silva-Almodóvar, A. (2021). impact of telehealth interventions on medication adherence for patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia: A systematic review. The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 55(5), 637–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1060028020950726
Dehghan-Nayeri, N., Ghaffari, F., Sadeghi, T., & Mozaffari, N. (2019). Effects of motivational interviewing on adherence to treatment regimens among patients with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Spectrum, 32(2), 112-117.
Ekong, G. (2018). Motivational Interviewing for Diabetes Medication Adherence in Type 1 Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Patients.
Lee, P. A., Greenfield, G., & Pappas, Y. (2018). The impact of telehealth remote patient monitoring on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials. BMC health services research, 18(1), 1-10.
Li, Z., Chen, Q., Yan, J., Liang, W., & Wong, W. C. (2020). Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on improving Care for Patients with type 2 diabetes in China: A randomized controlled trial. BMC health services research, 20(1), 1-9.
Long, H., Bartlett, Y. K., Farmer, A. J., & French, D. P. (2019). Identifying brief message content for interventions delivered via mobile devices to improve medication adherence in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a rapid systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(1), e10421.
McCurley, J. L., Gutierrez, A. P., & Gallo, L. C. (2017). Diabetes prevention in U.S. Hispanic adults: A systematic review of culturally tailored interventions. American journal of preventive medicine, 52(4), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.028
Phillips, A. S., & Guarnaccia, C. A. (2020). Self-determination theory and motivational interviewing interventions for type 2 diabetes prevention and treatment: A systematic review. Journal of health psychology, 25(1), 44–66.
Polonsky, W. H., & Henry, R. R. (2016). Poor medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: recognizing the scope of the problem and its key contributors. Patient preference and adherence, 10, 1299.