As a healthcare administrator, it is important to be able to evaluate the effectiveness of your staff’s ability to follow rules like HIPAA and HITECH, as well as to facilitate patient autonomy.Create a survey using the consumer perspective that could be administered to patients to review their experience at your facility in a patient-centered initiative, focusing on privacy. Be sure to include questions that will measure the safety of their personal information, procedures used to keep information private, and specific items that are required by HIPAA. Be sure to look at the survey from a patient perspective.Your survey should include 10-15 questions, and include a paragraph for each question which specifies:1. How you would use information gained from that question to improve healthcare in your facility, and2. Any ethical implications of the questions you provided.While the format can be in a survey format, with paragraphs explaining the necessity of the questions and how the feedback will be helpful to your facility, remember to cite your sources.Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length. Be sure to include a cover page and references formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. Be sure to discuss and reference concepts taken from the assigned textbook reading and relevant research. You must include a minimum of three credible, academic or professional references beyond the text or other course materials. Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.HCM515 Mod04 CTCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements20 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationIncludes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment, including length, structure, and content.16 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationIncludes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.12 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationIncludes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.8 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceIncludes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent25 to >20.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials with respect to HIPAA and patient privacy; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.20 to >15.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.15 to >10.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge10 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis25 to >20.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProvides a strong critical analysis and interpretation based on the information given; shows strong critical thinking in developing survey.20 to >15.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.15 to >10.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.10 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples20 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.16 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.12 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.8 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceSource or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.10 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.8 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationProject is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.6 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationProject is poorly organized and does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.4 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style10 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.8 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.6 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.4 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.10 pts
Total Points: 110PreviousNext