{"id":106527,"date":"2022-11-24T02:17:49","date_gmt":"2022-11-24T02:17:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/2022\/11\/24\/persuasive-essay-exemplary-proficient-partially-proficient-basic-thesis-reasoning-25-meets\/"},"modified":"2022-11-24T02:17:49","modified_gmt":"2022-11-24T02:17:49","slug":"persuasive-essay-exemplary-proficient-partially-proficient-basic-thesis-reasoning-25-meets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/2022\/11\/24\/persuasive-essay-exemplary-proficient-partially-proficient-basic-thesis-reasoning-25-meets\/","title":{"rendered":"Persuasive Essay Exemplary Proficient Partially Proficient Basic Thesis &amp; Reasoning (25%) Meets"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Persuasive Essay <\/p>\n<p> Exemplary<\/p>\n<p> Proficient<\/p>\n<p> Partially Proficient<\/p>\n<p> Basic<\/p>\n<p> Thesis &amp; Reasoning<\/p>\n<p> (25%)<\/p>\n<p> Meets Proficient and is precise, well connected, and clear (23-25 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Thesis is clear and well developed<\/p>\n<p> Reasoning to support the thesis is clear and well connected<\/p>\n<p> (18-22 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Thesis states the intent, but is not clear, or thesis is passive<\/p>\n<p> Reasoning seems to align with thesis, but lacks clear connection (10-17 pts)<\/p>\n<p> No thesis determinable <\/p>\n<p> Reasoning is ambiguous at best<\/p>\n<p> (0-9 pts) <\/p>\n<p> Structure<\/p>\n<p> (25%)<\/p>\n<p> Meets Proficient and contributes to the overall success of the work<\/p>\n<p> (23-25 pts)<\/p>\n<p> The sequence\/order of paragraphs is clear and complimentary to the whole.<\/p>\n<p> Transitions are connected and work well moving from one topic to the next (18-22 pts)<\/p>\n<p> The essay has a clear beginning, middle, and end. <\/p>\n<p> The sequence\/order of paragraphs impede the flow of the work<\/p>\n<p> Transitions were minimal and not effective<\/p>\n<p> The essay is missing a clear beginning, middle, or end<\/p>\n<p> (10-17 pts)<\/p>\n<p> The sequence\/order of paragraphs is not clear, or paragraph breaks were not included<\/p>\n<p> Transitions were not included<\/p>\n<p> The essay is missing major portions <\/p>\n<p> (0-9 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Control\/Articulation<\/p>\n<p> (25%)<\/p>\n<p> Meets proficient and demonstrates articulation of strong academic\/professional work <\/p>\n<p> (23-25 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Word choice and formal register were utilized to contribute to and effect the tone of the work (18-22 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Clear control of language is present and effective <\/p>\n<p> Word choice and register were mixed, or were more informal in nature. Used slang, contractions, and or other forms of informal language. (10-17 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Word choice and articulation compromise the overall intent of the work<\/p>\n<p> Interferes with reader understanding<\/p>\n<p> (0-9 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Research and Support<\/p>\n<p> (15%)<\/p>\n<p> Meets proficient and had no errors with citation standards. Had more than required citations and sources<\/p>\n<p> (13-15 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Research was cited and used to support thesis and main points in the essay<\/p>\n<p> Minimal errors with citation standards<\/p>\n<p> (9-12 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Research was cited, but did not support thesis or main ideas clearly<\/p>\n<p> Errors with citations interfere with flow of the work<\/p>\n<p> Did not cite required number in text or in works cited (5-8 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Research was not utilized or cited<\/p>\n<p> When using research, it was difficult to determine what was cited and what was not<\/p>\n<p> No clear attempt to follow citation standard was evident (0-4 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Mechanics<\/p>\n<p> (10%)<\/p>\n<p> Meets proficient and had no noticeable errors <\/p>\n<p> (9-10 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Few errors which did not interfere with flow or readability (6-8 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Many errors \u2013 interfered with flow and readability<\/p>\n<p> (3-5 pts)<\/p>\n<p> Errors were so frequent flow\/readability was completely disrupted <\/p>\n<p> (0-2 pts)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Persuasive Essay Exemplary Proficient Partially Proficient Basic Thesis &amp; Reasoning (25%) Meets Proficient and is precise, well connected, and clear (23-25 pts) Thesis is clear and well developed Reasoning to support the thesis is clear and well connected (18-22 pts) Thesis states the intent, but is not clear, or thesis is passive Reasoning seems to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[10],"class_list":["post-106527","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-paper-writing","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106527","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=106527"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/106527\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=106527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=106527"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=106527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}