NR449 Evidence-Based Practice<\/p>\n
RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines<\/p>\n
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice<\/p>\n
RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines<\/p>\n
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice<\/p>\n
RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines<\/p>\n
Purpose<\/p>\n
The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic.<\/p>\n
Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.<\/p>\n
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8)<\/p>\n
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 and 8)<\/p>\n
Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.<\/p>\n
Total points possible: 200 points<\/p>\n
Preparing the assignment<\/p>\n
Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.<\/p>\n
Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group.<\/p>\n
The paper will include the following:<\/p>\n
Clinical Question (30 points\/15%)<\/p>\n
Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group\u2019s work?<\/p>\n
Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.<\/p>\n
Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe?<\/p>\n
***Please note that although most of these questions are the same as you addressed in paper 1, the purpose of this paper is different. You can use your paper 1 for items 1 & 2 above, including any faculty suggestions for improvement provided as feedback.<\/p>\n
Use Evidence Matrix Table Template: Data Summary – (60 points\/30%)<\/p>\n
Categorize items in the Evidence Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.<\/p>\n
References (recent publication within the last 5 years)<\/p>\n
Purpose\/Hypothesis\/Study Question(s)<\/p>\n
Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D)<\/p>\n
Study Design<\/p>\n
Sample Size and Selection<\/p>\n
Data Collection Methods<\/p>\n
Major Findings (Evidence)<\/p>\n
Description of Findings (60 points\/30%)<\/p>\n
Describe the data in the Evidence Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.<\/p>\n
Compare and contrast variables within each study.<\/p>\n
What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.?<\/p>\n
Participant demographics and information.<\/p>\n
Instruments used, including reliability and validity.<\/p>\n
How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence is needed to answer your question?<\/p>\n
Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group\u2019s work.<\/p>\n
Conclusion (20 points\/10%)<\/p>\n
Review major findings in a summary paragraph.<\/p>\n
Evidence to address your clinical problem.<\/p>\n
Make a connection back to all the included sections.<\/p>\n
Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think about.<\/p>\n
Format (30 points\/15%)<\/p>\n
Correct grammar and spelling<\/p>\n
Include a title and reference page<\/p>\n
Use of headings for each section:<\/p>\n
Problem<\/p>\n
Synthesis of the Literature<\/p>\n
Variables<\/p>\n
Methods<\/p>\n
Participants<\/p>\n
Instruments<\/p>\n
Implications for Future Work<\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/p>\n
Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines<\/p>\n
Include at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary sources other than the textbook<\/p>\n
3-4 pages in length, excluding appendices, title, and reference pages<\/p>\n
For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center.<\/p>\n
Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned.<\/p>\n
2<\/p>\n
Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student\u2019s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.<\/p>\n
Assignment Section and Required Criteria<\/p>\n
(Points possible\/% of total points available)<\/p>\n
Highest Level of Performance<\/p>\n
High Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Satisfactory Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Section not present in paper<\/p>\n
Clinical Question<\/p>\n
(30 points\/15%)<\/p>\n
30 points<\/p>\n
26 points<\/p>\n
24 points<\/p>\n
11 points<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Required criteria<\/p>\n
Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group\u2019s work?<\/p>\n
Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.<\/p>\n
Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe?<\/p>\n
Includes 3 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 2 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 1 requirement for section.<\/p>\n
Present, yet includes no required criteria.<\/p>\n
No requirements for this section presented.<\/p>\n
Evidence Matrix Table: Data Summary (Appendix A)<\/p>\n
(60 points\/30%)<\/p>\n
60 points<\/p>\n
56 points<\/p>\n
47 points<\/p>\n
25 points<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Required criteria<\/p>\n
Categorize items in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.<\/p>\n
References (recent publication within the last 5 years)<\/p>\n
Purpose\/Hypothesis\/Study Question(s)<\/p>\n
Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D)<\/p>\n
Study Design<\/p>\n
Sample Size and Selection<\/p>\n
Data Collection Methods<\/p>\n
Major Findings (Evidence)<\/p>\n
Includes 7 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 6 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 5 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 4 or less requirements for section.<\/p>\n
No requirements for this section presented.<\/p>\n
Description of Findings<\/p>\n
(60 points\/30%)<\/p>\n
60 points<\/p>\n
53 points<\/p>\n
47 points<\/p>\n
23 points<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Required criteria<\/p>\n
Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.<\/p>\n
Compare and contrast variables within each study.<\/p>\n
What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.?<\/p>\n
Participant demographics and information.<\/p>\n
Includes 6 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 5 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 4 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 3 or less requirements for section.<\/p>\n
No requirements for this section presented.<\/p>\n
Assignment Section and Required Criteria<\/p>\n
(Points possible\/% of total points available)<\/p>\n
Highest Level of Performance<\/p>\n
High Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Satisfactory Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Section not present in paper<\/p>\n
Instruments used, including reliability and validity.<\/p>\n
How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence is needed to answer your question?<\/p>\n
Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group\u2019s<\/p>\n
work.<\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/p>\n
(20 points\/10%)<\/p>\n
20 points<\/p>\n
18 points<\/p>\n
15 points<\/p>\n
8 points<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Required criteria<\/p>\n
Review major findings in a summary paragraph.<\/p>\n
Evidence to address your clinical problem.<\/p>\n
Make a connection back to all the included sections.<\/p>\n
Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think about.<\/p>\n
Includes 3 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 2 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 1 requirement for section.<\/p>\n
Present, yet includes no required criteria.<\/p>\n
No requirements for this section presented.<\/p>\n
Format<\/p>\n
(30 points\/15%)<\/p>\n
30 points<\/p>\n
26 points<\/p>\n
23 points<\/p>\n
11 points<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Required criteria<\/p>\n
Correct grammar and spelling<\/p>\n
Include a title and reference page<\/p>\n
Use of headings for each section:<\/p>\n
Problem<\/p>\n
Synthesis of the Literature<\/p>\n
Variables<\/p>\n
Methods<\/p>\n
Participants<\/p>\n
Instruments<\/p>\n
Implications for Future Work<\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/p>\n
Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines<\/p>\n
Includes at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary sources other than the textbook<\/p>\n
3-4 pages in length excluding appendices, title, and reference pages<\/p>\n
Includes 7 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 6 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 5 requirements for section.<\/p>\n
Includes 4 or less requirements for section.<\/p>\n
No requirements for this section presented.<\/p>\n
Total Points Possible = 200 points <\/p>\n
Appendix A<\/p>\n
EVIDENCE MATRIX TABLE<\/p>\n
Article<\/p>\n
References<\/p>\n
Purpose Hypothesis<\/p>\n
Study Question(s)<\/p>\n
Variables Independent(I) Dependent(D)<\/p>\n
Study Design<\/p>\n
Sample Size & Selection<\/p>\n
Data Collection Methods<\/p>\n
Major Finding(s)<\/p>\n
1<\/p>\n
Smith, L. (2013). What<\/p>\n
How do educational support<\/p>\n
D-Dietary<\/p>\n
Quantitative<\/p>\n
N- 18<\/p>\n
Focus Groups<\/p>\n
Support and education<\/p>\n
(SAMPLE<\/p>\n
should I eat? A focus for<\/p>\n
groups effect dietary modifications<\/p>\n
modifications<\/p>\n
Convenience<\/p>\n
improved compliance with<\/p>\n
ARTICLE)<\/p>\n
those living with diabetes.<\/p>\n
in patients with diabetes?<\/p>\n
I-Education<\/p>\n
sample-selected<\/p>\n
dietary modifications.<\/p>\n
Journal of Nursing<\/p>\n
from local support<\/p>\n
Education, 1(4), 111-112.<\/p>\n
group in Pittsburgh,<\/p>\n
PA<\/p>\n
1<\/p>\n
2<\/p>\n
3<\/p>\n
4<\/p>\n
5<\/p>\n
\u00a9 2021 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved<\/p>\n
NR449_RUA_Analyzing_Published_Research_v3_JUL22 2<\/p>\n
\u00a9 2022 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved<\/p>\n
NR449_RUA_Analyzing_Published_Research_v4_JUL22 1<\/p>\n
\u00a9 2022 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved<\/p>\n
NR449_RUA_Analyzing_Published_Research_v4_JUL22 4<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines Purpose The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[10],"class_list":["post-107295","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-paper-writing","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107295","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107295"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107295\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}