Respond to following post below–\u00a0<\/p>\n
Instructions —-Your reading and follow-up response to a fellow student\u2019s discussion reply should not be a general acceptance of his or her opinion, but rather something that challenges the student to defend his or her stated response, or something that presents an alternate idea or additional analysis. Again, research should be used as evidence in your follow-up responses.<\/p>\n
Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between one or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Follow-up posts should also be substantive and include support from examples and correctly cited research when possible. Follow-up posts usually should not exceed 300 words. O Remember though, substance is more important than word count. Simply agreeing or disagreeing is not considered substantive. One or two sentences are not usually considered substantive. The dialogues should be useful conversations that analyze topics both broadly and deeply, providing evidence (research) that supports your response.\u00a0 Do not use plagerisim\u00a0
There were both negative and positive impacts that were associated with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. An employer share responsibility requirement (ESRR) that was hedged against the possibility that employers would drop health insurance they offer and send their workers to the Marketplace. Companies with more than 50 employees could face penalties if they did not offer some way for employees to obtain medical coverage. Two thousand dollars per employee was the fine that would be imposed (Abraham<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Respond to following post below–\u00a0 Instructions —-Your reading and follow-up response to a fellow student\u2019s discussion reply should not be a general acceptance of his or her opinion, but rather something that challenges the student to defend his or her stated response, or something that presents an alternate idea or additional analysis. Again, research should […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[12],"class_list":["post-12457","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-paper-writing","tag-religion-and-theology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12457"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12457\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}