The purpose of this assignment is to explore\u00a0the role of a nurse as an advocate in the vulnerable population setting. The student will examine\u00a0a current political policy or existing healthcare organization with a potential impact on a vulnerable population. Possible solutions will be explored through the process of scholarly inquiry and consultation.\u00a0
\u00a0Requirements:
Select a vulnerable population for which you would enjoy acting as an advocate.\u00a0
Consider a current political policy or existing\u00a0organization that has a potential impact on this vulnerable population.
Perform an informal Internet search as well as a scholarly literature review to familiarize yourself with the situation of the vulnerable population. Repeat this procedure to examine an organization or policy with potential impact being examined. Using the process of scholarly inquiry, formulate a specific, realistic intervention that could be implemented to help this population and address a disparity in health care.\u00a0
Act as a nurse advocate for this vulnerable population and complete the following activity:\u00a0
Write a letter to a senator or other stakeholder (see template) advocating for a specific change based on evidence that could address the needs of the vulnerable population being examined. Mail the letter and submit it to the dropbox.\u00a0
See grading rubric for additional details. \u00a0\u00a0
Module 3 Vulnerable Population Rubric.pdf\u00a0\u00a0download\u00a0
AttachmentsLetter Template.docx
*This Assignment includes 4 indirect practice experience hours.\u00a0
Practice logs are required for all practice assignments where indicated. \u00a0\u00a0To successfully complete this course each student must submit accurate and complete practice logs as per course and faculty directions.\u00a0\u00a0Remember to complete the practice experience log and submit it for grading.
*
RubricModule 3 Vulnerable PopulationsModule 3 Vulnerable PopulationsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody of letter45\u00a0to >41.4\u00a0ptsExceptionalVulnerable population identified. Comprehensive description of the population issue is explained utilizing a scholarly review. Comprehensive discussion of an organization or policy that would have potential impact on the population issue.41.4\u00a0to >38.7\u00a0ptsProficientVulnerable population identified. Description of the population issue explained utilizing scholarly references. Discussion of an organization or policy that would have potential impact on the population issue38.7\u00a0to >35.55\u00a0ptsMinimally PassingVulnerable population identified. Description of the population issue explained but references were not all scholarly Briefly discusses an organization or policy that would have potential impact on the population issue35.55\u00a0to >0\u00a0ptsNot PassingNo population identified. No description of population issue Missing organization or policy to make an impact on a population. Missing purpose of the letter45\u00a0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLetter Format30\u00a0to >27.6\u00a0ptsExceptionalProfessional format utilized. \u2022 Date: put on top of page for communication. \u2022 Address: of the person receiving the correspondence includes a formal name, street address, city, state, and zip code \u2022 Salutation \u2022 Introduction \u2022 Body of Letter \u2022 Closing \u2022 Signature27.6\u00a0to >25.8\u00a0ptsProficientProfessional format utilized. One required item missing from the letter format25.8\u00a0to >23.7\u00a0ptsMinimally PassingProfessional format utilized. Two required items missing from the letter format23.7\u00a0to >0\u00a0ptsNot PassingMissing purpose of the letter30\u00a0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization of Letter5\u00a0to >4.6\u00a0ptsExceptionalConcise and well-organized writing. Ideas are described clearly and are presented in a logical sequence. Ideas and arguments are fully supported and developed through evidence. Headings are used appropriately to indicate new content areas.4.6\u00a0to >4.3\u00a0ptsProficientClear organization of main points. Ideas are described clearly and are presented in a logical sequence. Support and development of ideas is present, but one or more areas lack evidence. Headings are used appropriately to indicate new content areas. Paragraph structure is appropriate with logical transitions.4.3\u00a0to >3.95\u00a0ptsMinimally PassingClear organization of main points but some areas may stray from logical sequence. Support of ideas present but is not consistent. Use of headings is not consistent. Minimal paragraph structure issues.3.95\u00a0to >0\u00a0ptsNot PassingWriting lacks logical organization. Poorly organized, ideas are not developed adequately in the letter. and lack unity. Paragraph\u2019s headings are not used appropriately. Major paragraph structure issues.5\u00a0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Writing10\u00a0to >9.2\u00a0ptsExceptionalSentence structure clear, with smooth transitions, correct grammar, and punctuation. No spelling errors. Uses standard English language. Word choice is correct, precise, and unambiguous. Introduction has a clear statement addressing the topic. Body paragraphs have topic sentences that are logical and fully developed. Paragraph structure is appropriate with logical transitions. Writing does not reveal discriminatory bias. Unity of the letter clearly leads the reader to the conclusion and stirs thought regarding the topic.9.2\u00a0to >8.6\u00a0ptsProficientOverall sentence structure is clear, with smooth transitions. Less than 3 grammar, punctuation, or spelling errors. Introduction has a clear statement addressing the topic. Body paragraphs have topic sentences that are logical and fully developed. Paragraph structure is appropriate with logical transitions. Writing does not reveal discriminatory bias. Unity of the letter clearly leads the reader to the conclusion.8.6\u00a0to >7.9\u00a0ptsMinimally PassingOverall sentence structure is clear, with smooth transitions. Less than 5 grammar, punctuation, or spelling errors. Introduction has a clear statement addressing the topic. Minimal paragraph structure issues. Transitions evident but not used throughout Writing does not reveal discriminatory bias.7.9\u00a0to >0\u00a0ptsNot PassingSpelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult, includes fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. Errors are frequent. Clear bias is evident. Ideas lack unity.10\u00a0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA10\u00a0to >9.2\u00a0ptsExceptionalReferences are current and are cited appropriately throughout letter. Letter is written using a business format.9.2\u00a0to >8.6\u00a0ptsProficientReferences are current and are cited appropriately throughout letter. Letter is written but 3 of the 7 items of a business letter not included.8.6\u00a0to >7.9\u00a0ptsMinimally PassingReferences are current and are cited appropriately throughout letter. Letter is written but 5 of the 7 items of a business letter not included.7.9\u00a0to >0\u00a0ptsNot PassingReferences are not current and\/ or are not appropriately cited. Letter is not consistent of a business letter.10\u00a0pts
Total Points:\u00a0100Previous<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The purpose of this assignment is to explore\u00a0the role of a nurse as an advocate in the vulnerable population setting. The student will examine\u00a0a current political policy or existing healthcare organization with a potential impact on a vulnerable population. Possible solutions will be explored through the process of scholarly inquiry and consultation.\u00a0 \u00a0Requirements: Select a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[12],"class_list":["post-16536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-paper-writing","tag-religion-and-theology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16536"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16536\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}