{"id":49814,"date":"2021-09-11T19:01:08","date_gmt":"2021-09-11T19:01:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/2021\/09\/11\/discussion-rubric-initial-postmeets-expectations2-to-3-pointsnearly-meets-expectations0-to-2-pointsdoes-not\/"},"modified":"2021-09-11T19:01:08","modified_gmt":"2021-09-11T19:01:08","slug":"discussion-rubric-initial-postmeets-expectations2-to-3-pointsnearly-meets-expectations0-to-2-pointsdoes-not","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/2021\/09\/11\/discussion-rubric-initial-postmeets-expectations2-to-3-pointsnearly-meets-expectations0-to-2-pointsdoes-not\/","title":{"rendered":"Discussion Rubric (Initial Post)Meets Expectations&gt;2 to 3 PointsNearly Meets Expectations&gt;0 to 2 PointsDoes Not"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Discussion Rubric (Initial Post) <br \/>Meets Expectations <br \/> &gt;2 to 3 PointsNearly Meets Expectations <br \/> &gt;0 to 2 PointsDoes Not Meet Expectations <br \/> 0 PointsRelevance of PostAnswer relates to the discussion question, is accurate and relevant, presents correct information, and demonstrates critical thinking.Answer relates to the discussion question but demonstrates minimal critical thinking or contains misinformation, inaccurate thinking, and\/or irrelevant remarks.Answer does not relate to the discussion question.Expression Within the PostClear and concise expression of opinions and ideas with obvious connection to topicMinimal expression of opinions or ideas or unclear connection to topic.No clear expression of opinions or ideas or no connection to topic.APA\/Writing\/MechanicsPost is grammatically correct with rare misspellings; adheres to all APA guidelines; consistently cites at least two resources in APA format to support opinion.Some spelling and grammar errors in post; cites at least one resource to support opinion, but APA format contains errors.Many spelling and grammar errors in post; post appears \u201chasty,\u201d does not follow APA guidelines; post does not cite any resources in APA format to support opinion.Total <br \/> 9 Points <\/p>\n<p> Discussion Guidelines <br \/>Initial Post <br \/>Read the NAQ article that was posted in the lesson. Knowing what you know from the chapters in this unit (Chapters 9 through 13), discuss the recommendations presented in the article for the Ideal system: <br \/>Simple, fast documentation with minimal redundancy <br \/>EHR coordination with patient and family needs and wishes <br \/>Central source of best practice forms and other resources in a free, vendor-neutral, and accessible library <br \/>Multidisciplinary collaboration on the design of EHR and CDS systems <br \/>Data: Standardized, actionable, and interoperable <br \/>Integration of biomedical devices with the EHR to avoid nurses entering that data <br \/>Multiple sources of decision support information for clinicians <br \/>Decision support dashboards <br \/>Discuss how these recommendations (re: nursing informatics) would affect nursing workflow and meaningful use. Pick and choose some of the ideas from the article and apply them to workflow analysis, system design, and meaningful use concepts from Chapter 13. This will require a bit of thinking, and please do not feel locked into one recommendation. Just make sure to support your opinions with rationales. Feel free to speculate and explore! Enjoy the opportunity! <br \/>Be sure to make reference to the week&#8217;s readings in your response. This week, your initial post may be longer than one paragraph. Try to present your main thoughts about the recommendations as a whole and then support your reactions with examples of some of the recommendations. <\/p>\n<p>example from a fellow student to follow : <\/p>\n<p>Discussion 4.1: The Ideal System <br \/>From the readings, it is learned that the Electronic Health Record (EHR) has come a long way but is still not where it needs to be. Healthcare professionals are currently faced with many challenges that negatively impact their daily workflow. In the article,\u00a0&#8220;EHR documentation: The hype and the hope for improving nursing satisfaction and quality outcomes,&#8221;\u00a0 the authors have a vision and list 8 recommendations for an ideal system, with the ultimate goal of achieving\u00a0quality healthcare at a better cost. They include:\u00a0 <br \/>Simple, fast documentation with minimal redundancy <br \/>EHR coordination with patient and family needs and wishes <br \/>Central source of best practice forms and other resources in a free, vendor-neutral, and accessible library <br \/>Multidisciplinary collaboration on the design of EHR and CDS systems <br \/>Data: Standardized, actionable, and interoperable <br \/>Integration of biomedical devices with the EHR to avoid nurses entering that data <br \/>Multiple sources of decision support information for clinicians <br \/>Decision support dashboards (O&#8217;Brien et al., 2015)\u00a0 <br \/>O&#8217;Brien et al. (2015) states, &#8220;Ideally, EHRs should be designed with optimal usability concepts in mind, including consistency, effective information presentation, naturalness, efficiency, flexibility, and feedback to support users and prevent errors.&#8221; The previously\u00a0mentioned\u00a0recommendations would benefit nursing workflow by adding value to organizations. They also correspond\u00a0with the components of meaningful use, as well as, meet the criteria of the rules and regulations established by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. By combining some of these recommendations and utilizing workflow analysis, it is possible to find solutions that elevate the EHR and organizations\u00a0while providing more support for healthcare workers.\u00a0 <br \/>For example, a\u00a0simple, fast documentation with minimal redundancy would enhance nursing workflow by\u00a0reducing the data-entry burden for nurses and promote interaction with patients (O\u2019Brien et al., 2015). It would also\u00a0reduce system mistakes when accessing patient data that could lead to medication errors due to wrong patient identification (M<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Discussion Rubric (Initial Post) Meets Expectations &gt;2 to 3 PointsNearly Meets Expectations &gt;0 to 2 PointsDoes Not Meet Expectations 0 PointsRelevance of PostAnswer relates to the discussion question, is accurate and relevant, presents correct information, and demonstrates critical thinking.Answer relates to the discussion question but demonstrates minimal critical thinking or contains misinformation, inaccurate thinking, and\/or [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[18],"class_list":["post-49814","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-paper-writing","tag-nursing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49814","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49814"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49814\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49814"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49814"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49814"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}