{"id":70272,"date":"2021-11-03T07:20:18","date_gmt":"2021-11-03T07:20:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/2021\/11\/03\/revision-application-of-blockchain-technology-for-improving-transparency-efficiency-and-sustainable-development-of-npos-a-systematic-review\/"},"modified":"2021-11-03T07:20:18","modified_gmt":"2021-11-03T07:20:18","slug":"revision-application-of-blockchain-technology-for-improving-transparency-efficiency-and-sustainable-development-of-npos-a-systematic-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/2021\/11\/03\/revision-application-of-blockchain-technology-for-improving-transparency-efficiency-and-sustainable-development-of-npos-a-systematic-review\/","title":{"rendered":"[Revision] Application of Blockchain Technology for Improving Transparency, Efficiency and Sustainable Development of NPO&#8217;S &#8212;&#8211;A systematic review"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>please see the file uploaded[November 03, 2021 02:20] Please, amend:<\/p>\n<p>1) 2.2.1. Search Strategy has the same text as inclusion exclusion criteria subsection \u2013 here those a labelled as \u2018limiters\u2019 \u2013 \u2018sources with qualitative, quantitative or mixed designs. Another limiter was the year of publication, with sources published between 2011 and 2021 utilized for the current review. According to Creswell (16), relying on sources published within a ten-year gap facilitates the use of updated information, hence improving the reliability and credibility of the study results. Lastly, the selected sources had all\/some participants from the US, were peer-reviewed materials and contained full-texts\u2019<\/p>\n<p>2) There is only 1 exclusion criterion in text \u2013 \u2018eliminating sources with participants not directly involved in NPOs or blockchain technology\u2019<\/p>\n<p>3) No data analysis section<\/p>\n<p>4) Most of the findings chapter is \u2018Characteristics of the Included Studies\u2019 section, the latter text focuses quite a bit on the methodologies and other such details, e.g. \u2018In particular, Rugeviciute and Mehrpouya (15) conducted an inductive qualitative study involving analysis of empirical data obtained from different sources to interrogate the enablers and barriers of blockchain technology, with the results disclosing the institutional, regulatory and technological aspects which impact sustainable NPOs\u2019 development. However, similar to Kshetri (1723), which did not disclose the sampling technique used in the research, Rugeviciute and Mehrpouya demonstrated a significant methodological weakness through inadequately explaining the sampling technique and the exact number of empirical sources utilized in the qualitative analysis, thereby inhibiting the findings\u2019 reliability.\u2019 \u2013 consider focusing more on the actual outcomes<\/p>\n<p>4.1) The is also a concern regarding the chosen sources, specifically, their description in Matrix, e.g. Kshetri (2017) \u2013 \u2018Qualitative desk-based analysis\u2019 \u2013 is it primary data? Pittman (2016) &#8211; Qualitative descriptive study- doctrinal analysis etc; a lot the sources do not seem to be based on primary data<\/p>\n<p>Please, make sure to adjust it in Results, amend Discussion and Conclusion is needed<\/p>\n<p>5) First half of Discussion uses the same sources for comparison &#8211; Wright; Farnaghi and Mansourian; Berentsen \u2013 consider expanding the reference use here a bit<\/p>\n<p>6) Add a section on Limitations in Conclusion<\/p>\n<p>7) Please, check the latest OR, there are quite a few instances where full sentences are highlighted, consider reducing the similarity index a bit<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>please see the file uploaded[November 03, 2021 02:20] Please, amend: 1) 2.2.1. Search Strategy has the same text as inclusion exclusion criteria subsection \u2013 here those a labelled as \u2018limiters\u2019 \u2013 \u2018sources with qualitative, quantitative or mixed designs. Another limiter was the year of publication, with sources published between 2011 and 2021 utilized for the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[14],"class_list":["post-70272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-paper-writing","tag-finance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70272"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70272\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}