An ability to critically engage with the ethical processes that are embedded within a piece of qualitative research is a fundamental part of any qualitative research training. All students are required to submit a 1000-word (not including bibliography\/references) critical ethical review of a research article. There will be a choice of three empirical research articles that students can choose from. Articles for review will be provided on the course Moodle site in the Critical Ethical Review section. The review is designed to provide students with the opportunity to critically engage with the evaluation of research ethics through the research design and presentation of findings in an empirical paper. This will involve assessing ethical considerations in the article, any ethical issues that may be present and how they may be responded to. Your review should focus on:The discussion of research ethics in the chosen articleGive examples, from the chosen article, of how research ethics have been addressedWhat are the potential ethical issues that arise in the chosen article?What are the associated ethical risks with the research methods chosen?Using academic literature on research ethics to help you critically review your article.Your review should be fully referenced, using the Harvard Style, and should draw on relevant methodological literature. Assessment will take into consideration, the following: How well you have demonstrated an awareness of research ethics in the article you have chosen to reviewWhether you have considered potential ethical issues and how they have been\/could be addressedProviding examples and evidence from your chosen articleHow reflexive are your critical discussions of research ethics in your chosen articleHow well the assignment is presented and referenced.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
An ability to critically engage with the ethical processes that are embedded within a piece of qualitative research is a fundamental part of any qualitative research training. All students are required to submit a 1000-word (not including bibliography\/references) critical ethical review of a research article. There will be a choice of three empirical research articles […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[10],"class_list":["post-71806","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-paper-writing","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71806","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71806"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71806\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}