CSIS 483<\/p>\n
Capstone Project Part III Grading Rubric<\/p>\n
Criteria<\/p>\n
Levels of Achievement<\/p>\n
Content <\/p>\n
Advanced 90-100%<\/p>\n
Proficient 70-89%<\/p>\n
Developing 1-69%<\/p>\n
Not present<\/p>\n
Introduction and conclusion<\/p>\n
9 to 10 points<\/p>\n
The introduction accurately outlines the project\u2019s primary objectives and justifies necessity for a solution. The conclusion explains the outcomes and solutions with excellence. More than 2 scholarly sources and 400 words combined.<\/p>\n
7 to 8 points<\/p>\n
The introduction accurately outlines most of the project\u2019s primary objectives and justifies necessity for a solution and\/or the conclusion explains the outcomes and solutions. Minimum of 2 scholarly sources and 400 words combined.<\/p>\n
1 to 6 points<\/p>\n
The introduction accurately outlines some of the project\u2019s primary objectives and\/or inadequately justifies necessity for a solution and\/or the conclusion fails to explain the outcomes and solutions and\/or does not meet the minimum of 2 scholarly sources and 400 words combined.<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Substantially unmet or not present<\/p>\n
Plan and Report<\/p>\n
9 to 10 points<\/p>\n
Report details all objectives required in the instructions with excellent logic, organization, and supporting references. Report indicates mastery of the subject matter and exceeds the textbook examples in quality and detail. Over 1,500 words and 5 unique scholarly articles or respected whitepapers relevant to the solution.<\/p>\n
7 to 8 points<\/p>\n
Report details all objectives required in the instructions with adequate logic, organization, and supporting references and\/or report indicates comprehension of the subject matter and meets the textbook examples in quality and detail and\/or a minimum of 1,500 words and 5 unique scholarly articles or respected whitepapers relevant to the solution exist.<\/p>\n
1 to 6 points<\/p>\n
Report is missing objectives required in the instructions with adequate logic, organization, and supporting references and\/or report indicates some misunderstanding of the subject matter and\/or does not meet the textbook examples in quality and detail and\/or a minimum of 1,500 words and 5 unique scholarly articles or respected whitepapers relevant to the solution does not exist.<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Substantially unmet or not present<\/p>\n
Project Solution<\/p>\n
36 to 40 points<\/p>\n
Capstone solution meets optimal industry best practices and standards within the configurations, designs, source code, syntax, and other computing instructions promised to the customer in the agreed upon schedule for this phase. Work completed parallels over 3 hours per person per week. Configurations, methods, parameters, rules, and\/or styles are well supported by existing textbook or scholarly support. Student\u2019s contribution is equal to peer contributions as shown in appropriate comments indicating authorship throughout the solution.<\/p>\n
28 to 35 points<\/p>\n
Capstone solution meets industry best practices and standards within the configurations, designs, source code, syntax, and other computing instructions promised to the customer in the agreed upon schedule for this phase and work completed parallels at least 3 hours per person per week and\/or configurations, methods, parameters, rules, and\/or styles are supported by existing textbook or scholarly support and student\u2019s contribution is equal to peer contributions as shown in appropriate comments indicating authorship throughout the solution.<\/p>\n
1 to 27 points<\/p>\n
Capstone solution partially meets industry best practices and standards within the configurations, designs, source code, syntax, and other computing instructions promised to the customer in the agreed upon schedule for this phase and\/or work completed does not parallel at least 3 hours per person per week and\/or configurations, methods, parameters, rules, and\/or styles are not properly supported by existing textbook or scholarly support and\/or student\u2019s contribution is not equal to peer contributions as shown in appropriate comments indicating authorship throughout the solution.<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Substantially not working or not present and\/or student\u2019s contribution is significantly lacking in comparison to peer contributions.<\/p>\n
APA, Grammar, and Spelling<\/p>\n
27 to 30 points<\/p>\n
Properly formatted APA paper with table of contents and references pages. Correct spelling and grammar used. Contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and\/or minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format. <\/p>\n
21 to 26 points<\/p>\n
Paper contains fewer than 5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and\/or some errors (3-7) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and\/or notable absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size, and line spacing.<\/p>\n
1 to 20 points<\/p>\n
Paper contains fewer than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content and\/or numerous errors (7+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format and\/or substantial absences in required APA formatting elements such as: Title page, running head, font type and size (Times New Roman 12 point), and line spacing.<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Paper contains more than 10 errors in grammar or spelling and\/or numerous errors (10+) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper APA format.<\/p>\n
Requirements<\/p>\n
9 to 10 points <\/p>\n
Solution is operational, shows mastery of the subject, and includes deliverables promised to customer within the assigned schedule for this phase. Over 2,000 words exist within the plan and\/or report and over 7 unique scholarly sources exist that sufficiently support the solution. Student\u2019s contribution is equal in quality and value as peer contributions. Biblical Worldview is core and fundamentally anchored throughout.<\/p>\n
7 to 8 points<\/p>\n
Solution is operational, shows comprehension of the subject, and includes within 80% of the deliverables promised to customer in the assigned schedule for this phase and\/or 2,000 words exist within the plan and\/or report and\/or over 7 unique scholarly sources exist that sufficiently support the solution and\/or the student\u2019s contribution is equal in quality and value as peer contributions. Biblical Worldview is present and active, though could have been more core to the write-up.<\/p>\n
1 to 6 points<\/p>\n
Solution is partially operational, shows some comprehension of the subject, and\/or includes less than 80% of the deliverables promised to customer in the assigned schedule for this phase and\/or less than 2,000 words exist within the plan and\/or report and\/or less than 7 unique scholarly sources exist that sufficiently support the solution and\/or the student\u2019s contribution is not equal in quality and value as peer contributions. Biblical Worldview is barely present and only there in a superficial way.<\/p>\n
0 points<\/p>\n
Substantially unmet or not present and\/or student\u2019s contribution is significantly lacking in comparison to peer contributions. Biblical Worldview is not present.<\/p>\n
Page 2 of 2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
CSIS 483 Capstone Project Part III Grading Rubric Criteria Levels of Achievement Content Advanced 90-100% Proficient 70-89% Developing 1-69% Not present Introduction and conclusion 9 to 10 points The introduction accurately outlines the project\u2019s primary objectives and justifies necessity for a solution. The conclusion explains the outcomes and solutions with excellence. More than 2 scholarly […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[10],"class_list":["post-80938","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-paper-writing","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80938"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80938\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}