{"id":93616,"date":"2022-03-14T22:38:54","date_gmt":"2022-03-14T22:38:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/2022\/03\/14\/1-1-discussion-writing-a-case-study-getting-started-this-discussion-is-designed\/"},"modified":"2022-03-14T22:38:54","modified_gmt":"2022-03-14T22:38:54","slug":"1-1-discussion-writing-a-case-study-getting-started-this-discussion-is-designed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/2022\/03\/14\/1-1-discussion-writing-a-case-study-getting-started-this-discussion-is-designed\/","title":{"rendered":"1.1 Discussion: Writing a Case Study Getting Started This discussion is designed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>1.1 Discussion: Writing a Case Study<\/p>\n<p> Getting Started<\/p>\n<p> This discussion is designed to guide you through the process of preparing a case evaluation using the SOAP format.\u00a0 The activities in this forum will form the framework for all the case studies that will be graded each week and many of the discussion topics.<\/p>\n<p> Upon successful completion of the course material, you will be able to:<\/p>\n<p> Start thinking about medications as a prescriber as opposed to a nurse.<\/p>\n<p> Confidently complete case studies in subsequent workshops.<\/p>\n<p> Resources<\/p>\n<p> Textbook:\u00a0Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Nurses and Physicians\u00a0Assistants<\/p>\n<p> Lexi-Comp (available via Up-to-Date) or other suitable drug\/disease reference.<\/p>\n<p> Suggested treatment guidelines\/recommendations for this workshop<\/p>\n<p> Workshop One Case Study<\/p>\n<p> Background Information<\/p>\n<p> This activity is broken down into three separate parts:\u00a0 identifying problems, supporting problems with subjective\/objective (S\/O) information, and planning a course of care (A\/P).\u00a0 Your post should include all three elements to receive full credit.<\/p>\n<p> Writing a Case Study: Part One\u2014Identifying Problems<\/p>\n<p> In analyzing your patients that are presented in this class, we will use the problem-oriented approach.\u00a0 The first step is to create a problem list.\u00a0 Problems may be a patient concern, a healthcare professional&#8217;s concern, or both.\u00a0 Not all problems are diagnoses. Also, not all items listed in the past medical history need to be addressed as current problems. \u00a0 Problems may be symptoms, abnormal laboratory results, compliance issues, and so on. The problem list may include only one problem, or it may include ten or more.\u00a0Every patient is different.\u00a0Each student should try to identify\u00a0ONE\u00a0unique problem with patient HG in the\u00a0case study\u00a0provided.\u00a0 Although some problems will likely be duplicated, please try to cover all problems.<\/p>\n<p> Instructions<\/p>\n<p> Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.<\/p>\n<p> Navigate to the\u00a0Writing a Case Study\u00a0threaded discussion below and make an initial posting by the end of day five of this workshop.\u00a0 If there are no other problems to identify, select a problem that is already completed, but try to identify an alternate therapy.\u00a0 For this assignment, grading will focus on your ability to include all the necessary information as opposed to selecting the &#8220;best&#8221; therapeutic option.\u00a0 For case studies in future workshops, more emphasis will be placed on appropriate medication selection.<\/p>\n<p> The format that you choose to present your information is completely up to you.\u00a0 One that has suited many students well is the chart format, which might look something like the example below.<\/p>\n<p> Initial posts are due by the end of day five of the workshop. Respond to at least one of your peer&#8217;s postings by the end of day seven of this workshop.<\/p>\n<p> Problem<\/p>\n<p> Subjective\/Objective<\/p>\n<p> Assessment\/Plan<\/p>\n<p> Allergic rhinitis<\/p>\n<p> Pt complaints of runny nose, sneezing and non-productive cough<\/p>\n<p> Swollen nasal membranes<\/p>\n<p> Start patient on loratadine (Claritin\u00ae) 10mg daily<\/p>\n<p> Goals: eliminate allergy complaints (i.e. rhinorrhea, cough, swollen nasal membranes)<\/p>\n<p> Monitoring: assess symptoms (rhinorrhea, sneezing, cough, nasal membranes) at 3 month follow up appointment or sooner if symptoms do not resolve with medication.<\/p>\n<p> Patient education: Take medication daily for most effective results. Potential adverse effects include dry mouth, headache, and somnolence.<\/p>\n<p> Heartburn<\/p>\n<p> Pt complains of occasional heartburn, particularly after eating spicy food<\/p>\n<p> Start ranitidine (Zantac\u00ae) 150 mg as needed for heartburn symptoms<\/p>\n<p> Goals: eliminate heartburn symptoms<\/p>\n<p> Monitoring: assess for heartburn at 3 month follow up appointment or sooner if symptoms to not resolve with medication<\/p>\n<p> Patient education: Do not take more than 300 mg daily. Potential adverse effects include abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, and headache.<\/p>\n<p> Preview Rubric<br \/> Discussion (10 Points): 1.1, 1.2, 3.1, 4.1<\/p>\n<p> Top of Form<\/p>\n<p> Print Rubric<\/p>\n<p> This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can\u00a0give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.Criteria<\/p>\n<p> Level 4<\/p>\n<p> Level 3<\/p>\n<p> Level 2<\/p>\n<p> Level 1<\/p>\n<p> Criterion Score<\/p>\n<p> Quality<\/p>\n<p> 4 points<\/p>\n<p> Your postings are well developed and answers provide clear evidence of critical thinking.<\/p>\n<p> Your questions or observations add greater depth to the discussion by introducing new ideas.<\/p>\n<p> No grammatical errors.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p> 3 points<\/p>\n<p> Your postings show some development and some critical thinking is evident in your answers.<\/p>\n<p> Your questions and observations add to the discussion by expanding the ideas of others.<\/p>\n<p> 1-2 grammatical errors.<\/p>\n<p> 2 points<\/p>\n<p> Your postings show nominal development and only the beginnings of critical thinking.<\/p>\n<p> Your contributions (questions or observations) do not clearly add to the discussion.<\/p>\n<p> 3-4 grammatical errors.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p> 1 point<\/p>\n<p> Your postings show no development and are mostly a reiteration of what the textbook or others have said.<\/p>\n<p> Your questions and observations detract from the discussion.<\/p>\n<p> 5+ grammatical errors.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p> Score of Quality,\/ 4<\/p>\n<p> Timeliness<\/p>\n<p> 3 points<\/p>\n<p> Your initial posting to the question or topic assigned in the workshop activity is made by the end of the fifth day of the workshop.<\/p>\n<p> 2 points<\/p>\n<p> Your initial posting to the question or topic assigned in the workshop activity is made by the end of the sixth day of the workshop.<\/p>\n<p> 1 point<\/p>\n<p> Your initial posting to the question or topic assigned in the workshop activity is made by the end of the seventh day of the workshop.<\/p>\n<p> 0 points<\/p>\n<p> Your initial posting to the question or topic assigned in the workshop activity is not made by the seventh day of the workshop.<\/p>\n<p> Score of Timeliness,\/ 3<\/p>\n<p> Interaction<\/p>\n<p> 3 points<\/p>\n<p> You respond to a minimum of one other peer as well as all follow-up instructor and peer questions directed to you.<\/p>\n<p> You are clearly collaborative by taking the initiative to respond to peers questions, providing clarification and insight on issues in the discussion.<\/p>\n<p> 2 points<\/p>\n<p> You respond to one peer but do not respond to follow-up questions directed to you posted by either peers or the instructor.<\/p>\n<p> You are collaborative in some situations and show some initiative in workshop discussions.<\/p>\n<p> 1 point<\/p>\n<p> You respond to one peer but do not respond to instructor or peer follow-up questions directed to you.<\/p>\n<p> You show little initiative in discussions and your presence is not collaborative.<\/p>\n<p> 0 points<\/p>\n<p> You do not respond to the postings of others in the discussion or do not respond by the end of the workshop.<\/p>\n<p> Score of Interaction,\/ 3<\/p>\n<p> Rubric Total ScoreTotal<\/p>\n<p> Score of Discussion (10 Points): 1.1, 1.2, 3.1, 4.1,\/ 10Criterion score has been overridden<\/p>\n<p> Overall Score<\/p>\n<p> Bottom of Form<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>1.1 Discussion: Writing a Case Study Getting Started This discussion is designed to guide you through the process of preparing a case evaluation using the SOAP format.\u00a0 The activities in this forum will form the framework for all the case studies that will be graded each week and many of the discussion topics. Upon successful [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[10],"class_list":["post-93616","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-paper-writing","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93616","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93616"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93616\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93616"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93616"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93616"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}