Issues in Nutrition – Assessment Criteria \u2013 Task 1 (Narrative Review)<\/p>\n
Criteria & Weighting<\/p>\n
First <\/p>\n
(Excellent)<\/p>\n
Upper Second<\/p>\n
(Very Good)<\/p>\n
Lower Second<\/p>\n
(Good)<\/p>\n
Third <\/p>\n
(Sufficient)<\/p>\n
Fail<\/p>\n
(Insufficient)<\/p>\n
85 – 100% <\/p>\n
70 – 84%<\/p>\n
60 – 69%<\/p>\n
50 – 59%<\/p>\n
40 – 49%<\/p>\n
20-39%<\/p>\n
0-19%<\/p>\n
Ability to communicate effectively and appropriately (20%)<\/p>\n
Excellent communication; performance deemed to be beyond expectation. Work may achieve or be close to publishable or commercial standard.<\/p>\n
Excellent communication; performance deemed beyond expectation of the level.<\/p>\n
Strong communication skills.<\/p>\n
Communication shows clarity but structure may not always be coherent.<\/p>\n
Communication\/ presentation is generally competent but with some weaknesses.<\/p>\n
Communication shows limited clarity, poor presentation, structure may not be coherent.<\/p>\n
Weak technical & practical competence hampers ability to demonstrate\/communicate achievement of outcomes.<\/p>\n
Selection, discussion, critical analysis and referencing of appropriate and pertinent research (80%)<\/p>\n
Exceptional breadth & depth of knowledge & understanding of the area of study; evidence of extensive & appropriate selection & critical evaluation\/ synthesis\/ analysis & of reading\/research beyond the prescribed range, in both breadth & depth, to advance work\/direct arguments. Exceptional demonstration of relevant skills.<\/p>\n
Excellent knowledge & understanding of the area of study as the student is typically able to go beyond what has been taught; evidence of extensive & appropriate selection & critical evaluation\/ synthesis\/analysis of reading\/ research beyond the prescribed range, to advance work\/ direct arguments. Excellent demonstration of relevant skills.<\/p>\n
Very good knowledge & understanding of the area of study as the student is typically able to relate facts\/concepts together with some ability to apply to known\/ taught contexts; evidence of appropriate selection & critical evaluation of reading\/ research, some beyond the prescribed range, may rely on set sources to advance work\/ direct arguments; demonstrates autonomy in approach to learning. Very good demonstration of relevant skills.<\/p>\n
Good knowledge & understanding of the area of study balanced towards the descriptive rather than critical or analytical; evidence of appropriate selection & evaluation of reading\/research, some may be beyond the prescribed range, but generally reliant on set sources to advance work\/direct arguments. Good demonstration of relevant skills, though may be limited in range.<\/p>\n
Knowledge & understanding is sufficient to deal with terminology, basic facts & concepts but fails to make meaningful synthesis; some ability to select & evaluate reading\/research however work may be more generally descriptive; general reliance on set sources to advance work; arguments may be weak or poorly constructed; adequate demonstration of relevant skills over a limited range.<\/p>\n
Insufficient knowledge & understanding of the area of study; some ability to select & evaluate reading\/research however work is more generally descriptive; fails to address some aspects of the brief; uses set sources to advance work; arguments may be weak\/poor or weakly\/poorly constructed; demonstration of relevant skills over a reduced range.<\/p>\n
Highly insufficient knowledge or understanding of the area of study; understanding is typically at the word level with facts being reproduced in a disjointed or decontextualised manner; fails to address the outcomes addressed by the brief; typically ignores important sources in development of work & data\/evidence inappropriately used.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Issues in Nutrition – Assessment Criteria \u2013 Task 1 (Narrative Review) Criteria & Weighting First (Excellent) Upper Second (Very Good) Lower Second (Good) Third (Sufficient) Fail (Insufficient) 85 – 100% 70 – 84% 60 – 69% 50 – 59% 40 – 49% 20-39% 0-19% Ability to communicate effectively and appropriately (20%) Excellent communication; performance deemed […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[10],"class_list":["post-98200","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-paper-writing","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98200","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=98200"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98200\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=98200"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=98200"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/papersspot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=98200"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}