I have already written it I just need someone to verify it and add anything may be missing?
The paper:The article “Medical Marijuana: Addressing Impairment in the Working” focuses on the workplace sector particularly. The literary piece addresses how the continued legalization of the drug poses a greater risk to organizational culture. The authors demonstrate how organizations were previously concerned about matters of drug use that they conducted tests to ensure employees were free from drug abuse. However, this attitude has shifted over time, particularly after implementing policies aimed at loosening the restrictions on the use of marijuana as a medical drug. Even though medical marijuana is necessary for the treatment of diseases, it harms the general well-being of most employees at work. According to the National Institute on Substance Abuse (NIDA) research, 55 percent of employees who tested positive for the substance had an accident. In comparison, 85 percent of those who tested negative were harm (Roth, 2018). The writers discuss the article’s topic in depth using psychological concepts. The writers apply psychological concepts to the topic of the essay. The developmental principle is used to show human development criteria. For instance, according to the article, the workplace highly restricted the use of drugs among employees. However, based on the current situation, various states are reconsidering their policies based on the debate regarding the legalization of marijuana as a medicinal substance (Reilly, 1993). This development of human reasoning is one of the components used in this literary piece. Also, social-psychological principles are utilized by the authors to explain the concept of human behavior. For example, despite the continued legalization of marijuana, various factors accompanying the drug often challenge the workplace. According to the authors, most employees using the drug are bound to have reduced concentration, impaired judgment, and lack the motivation to complete tasks. Communication is one of the key concepts used in the text. The authors present the idea of marijuana concerning its effects in the workplace culture. This approach enables the reader to relate with the process through which marijuana has undergone to attain its status in society. Also, the article digs deep into how organizations need to incorporate strategies designed to mitigate the risk of workplace impairments by medical marijuana use. One of the approaches is creating a team obliged to holding a conversation regarding the topic to assist employees using the drug from overconsuming, but ensuring they use the drug as per the prescriptions. This communication approach prevents the essay from seeming biased on the substance, allowing readers to comprehend both the advantages and potential negative impacts of medical marijuana on people in the workplace. Marxist Criticism, which originates from Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, is the key theory utilized in the article. This theory is based on how human consciousness in any era is impacted by the feelings, modes of reasoning, values, beliefs, and concepts that people resonate with and demonstrate what they believe to be true. According to the research, marijuana has been considered an illegal substance in both professional and social settings throughout history (Schrot, 2016). This perception has been the norm since most organizations used to conduct drug tests to determine the purity of their employees based on their drug consumption history. However, the emergence of research and incorporation of policies supporting the use of the drug has led to changing perceptions regarding its use (Cohen, 2009). For instance, states in the United States and other nations are contemporarily reconsidering their restrictive measures regarding marijuana. This change in perspective has also made it difficult for most organizations to perform drug testing and prohibit people with marijuana traces from getting hired, despite the negative effects. The article has utilized a qualitative research method. Accumulating the information. involved the use of case studies and research materials. Also, the author incorporated Marxist theory to creatively organize the information and provide the necessary conclusion regarding the research topic. Phillips, a Medical Review Officer (MRO) it is one of the key thinkers cited in the article. He is specifically concerned with the significance of creating awareness in the workplace to help boost employee cooperation. For instance, organizations need to train employees, supervisors, and managers on their medical workplace accommodation policy, specifically what relates to the definition of impairment and impairment itself. Not only should this training include general knowledge, but it should specifically cover disability and how it may affect the workplace. He’s concerned about the status of human resources and their function in creating a stimulating or productive work environment. In the development of work policies, human resource professionals play a critical role. Therefore, to help prevent work impairment, they’re required to incorporate policies designed to prevent drug usage in the workplace. The article identifies various key assumptions regarding the use of marijuana in the workplace. The article demonstrates how contemporary society is embracing the legalization of marijuana. According to the authors, states in the US are reconsidering their policies regarding the restriction of marijuana by incorporating those designed to permit its utilization for recreational and medicinal purposes. However, the workplace culture is against this development since it believes that its legalization leads to employee impairment, leading to reduced productivity and cooperation (Goetz, 2007).
The article has utilized sources from various disciplines, perspectives and used different thinkers. The authors extracted information from sources associated with marijuana impairment, the current legalization process of the drug, and its implication in the workplace. These varying disciplines often led to varying perspectives regarding medicinal marijuana. For instance, from the article, readers can relate to how marijuana is gradually turning from an illegal substance to a legal one that often affects most of the productivity and cooperation required in the workplace. The discipline of incorporating strategies designed to prevent or limit marijuana use was essential to the conclusion. The authors concluded that medical marijuana is a common but unavoidable topic. Therefore, since marijuana use is against federal law but acceptable in some states, employers have the right to ban or restrict its use in the workplace. This discipline is essential since most organizations depend on their employees to facilitate growth and profitability. Also, drug testing and outreach discipline enabled an effective conclusion. By including techniques meant to test employees and finding the most successful ways for handling the task provided, the authors were able to uncover some of the components needed for a healthier work environment.
Because it incorporates data from several sources, the program is multidisciplinary. The authors used more than two literary sources from many fields to produce marijuana-related information and its effects in the workplace. This analysis is vital since it helps identify some of the essential aspects of the article. For instance, it expounded my understanding of marijuana, specifically based on how it affects the workplace and how It is possible to combine methods to prevent its use by employees. Also, the analysis has further created awareness regarding the process through which marijuana has shifted from being illegal to the inclusion of policies designed to legalize its use.
There was also an analysis of other articles by different authors (Wang, 2018). The subject matter of the piece originated from psychology. The critical thinkers cited as experts include Ingraham, who identified the rise in marijuana legalization and the federal law, which classified marijuana among the drugs with no current medical use and a high potential for abuse. According to the article, the world views marijuana to have no adverse effect evident from the public support for marijuana legalization.
In this topic, marijuana or cannabis is the most frequently used illicit substance abuse in the United States and worldwide. It is also the second most common psychotropic drug displayed when driving intoxicated, the following alcohol. 1,2 Also, the most frequently detected pharmaceuticals in workplace drug testing programs There is. The primary psychotropic drug for marijuana is simply delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, known as THC. The concentration of smokable plant material purchased on the street is steadily increasing. The THC content of marijuana averaged 3% in the 1980s and increased to 12% in 2012.
And as far as I remember, The US government classifies marijuana as a Schedule I drug (defined as a drug that is not currently accepted for medical purposes and is highly likely to be abused, four and its use possession will be prosecuted). Workers covered by the federal drug-testing program are prohibited from using marijuana at any time. In addition, federal law allows employers in all states to prohibit employees from working under the influence of marijuana and may impose disciplinary action on employees who violate this prohibition.
However, as public attitudes toward the use of marijuana have changed, the prohibition on using marijuana outside of federal law now varies from state to state. Although federal regulations continue to prohibit the possession and use of marijuana, many states and the District of Columbia have enacted marijuana use laws that conflict with federal laws and policies, and legislation in other states is still pending.
This ever-changing legal environment and ever-changing scientific evidence to prove its effectiveness in treating specific health conditions require assessing the safety of cannabis use by the American labor force. Although studies have shown that cannabis can be used with reasonable protection in specific controlled environments, its use involves potential workplace consequences and deserves scrutiny and attention.
Additionally, the possible consequences of marijuana use in the workplace include the risk of adverse events and the associated costs and loss of productivity.
The author’s research pulls from multiple disciplines since they evaluate whether marijuana has adverse effects such as impairments at the workplace and whether marijuana can use marijuana medically. The author uses evidence from different perspectives to analyze how to address medical marijuana use while promoting a safe and healthful work environment. The author relied on critical thinkers from various fields.
In conclusions made by the authors state that while the medicinal use of marijuana in federal workplaces is still restricted, states legalizing medical marijuana leave non-federal workplaces to figure out how to accommodate the changes and still protect the workplace (Kilmer