Review Case Study 12a p. 201 of Engineering Communication: A Practical Guide to Workplace Communication for Engineers. The case study includes a contentious memo written on behalf of the student. For the purposes of this discussion, place yourself as the recipient of this correspondence.After waiting until you are calm, you decide to draft a response that adheres to the principles of good technical communication. Your first step is to conduct a CMAPP analysis.For the Unit 4 Discussion Forum, please post your answers to the questions below: ContextWhat has prompted you to write a response?
How would you describe the relationship between you and your audience?
What would you be prepared to do if your response fails to meet its intended objective?
MessageWhat are your main points?
AudienceWho is your audience? If you have a secondary audience, who is it?
What do you think your primary audience knows?
What do you think that audience needs/wants to know?
PurposeWhat is your purpose? In other words, what is your intended objective mentioned under Context?
ProductWhat correspondence might you chose for your response: email, letter or other correspondence? Why?