Drawing upon lectures, the classroom video Crack: Cocaine, Corruption, and Conspiracy, and Hari’s discussion of addiction (in Chasing the Scream) how is the characterization of crack cocaine as “addictive” both true and interesting, but also distorted and misleading at the same time? How is such a characterization also a distraction—and from what does a focus on addiction to crack distract us?2. Provide an assessment of Schedule II Drugs that includes the following: (a) perceived medical differences between Schedule I and Schedule II drugs and (b) in specific regard to what we saw in class, media images of dealing Schedule II Drugs vs. images of dealing Schedule I drugs. Finally, how can a Schedule II drug (of your choice) be perceived as both a taboo like substance, but also a miracle-like substance? What processes are involved in regard to this dual perception (taboo—miracle drug).3. George Jung (in Blow) and Walter White (in Breaking Bad) gained non-fictional and fictional reputations as renowned figures in their respective Schedule II drug markets. Provide an analysis of both George and Walter that explains their involvement in the Schedule II markets—not only why they got involved, but why they stayed involved. What do you see as key similarities and key differences between George and Walter as “Schedule II drug kingpins.”?4. Compare and contrast how the media images presented in class depicts cocaine, crack cocaine, and methamphetamine. What do you see as the key differences? Based on your reading of Hari, how do you think he would interpret the media attention to all three of these substances? What, besides their Scheduled status, do the drugs have in common? Why do you regard such drugs as especially interesting to those in media?