Commentary should be precise and concise, in providing substantial arguments about how the films go after (appropriate and respond to) the empires – Japanese colonialism, Chinese cinema, or Nationalist Party’sfilm policy, and Hollywood film industry or world market.The commentary must be typed, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on all four sides of the page. You should proof-read your writing carefully, making sure that there are no spelling,grammar, or punctuation mistakesSo there will be some readings and three movies. Please compare and comment on the movie. Pick a theme and argue it with movies and readings. The commentary should be about the movie and support your comment on movies with readings.write a commentary in which you begin by stating a problematic (thesis) on Taiwan films, then go on to frame Taiwan film/theme(s) you plan to analyze or compare, to examine textual evidence in detail to support your argument, to draw on issues raised in class, and to conclude with your creative insights. The three movies are: 1. The Bride from Hell地獄新娘 (dir. Xin qi, 1965) : reading : Ping-hui Liao, “Bride from Hell”; Rigger 59-84. Yeh and Davis 25-53 2. A Borrowed Life 多桑 (dir. Wu Nien-jen, 1994): reading: Yeh and Davis 55-89 Rigger 85-1323. Terrorizers 恐怖份子 (dir. Edward Yang, 1986) : reading: Yeh and Davis 91-131 Rigger 133-185please avoid long synopsis or characterization. show your original thought through film analysis.