Project Benchmark #4: Strategy and Tactics Rubric
Criteria
(Weight)
Professional (100%)
Thorough
(90%)
Adequate
(70%)
Not Fully Developed (50%)
Does Not Meet Requirements (0%)
Dual Concerns Model
30%
Include a detailed description of both sides’ strategies in the negotiation.
Include a description and evaluation of at least 3 specific tactics each side is using to advance their strategy.
The strategies could use more description or leaves unanswered questions.
Fewer than 3 specific tactics were included in submission, or there weren’t enough details in the evaluation.
The strategies weren’t described or sparsely described, leaving a multitude of questions.
The tactics were not described or evaluated, beyond brief comments.
Strategies were mentioned and barely described.
Tactics were merely listed and fewer than 3.
No submission
Description and Application of Strategy and Tactics
30%
Applied strategies and tactics covered with much detail and integrated the Dual Concerns Model.
Applied strategies and tactics covered with some detail and integrated the Dual Concerns Model.
Applied strategies and tactics covered with minimal detail and integrated the Dual Concerns Model.
Applied strategies and tactics covered with little or no detail and did not integrate the Dual Concerns Model.
No submission
Explanation of Elements of both cooperation and competition
30%
Provided detailed insight and examples, explaining how the negotiation contains elements of both cooperation and competition.
Provided insight and examples, explaining how the negotiation contains elements of both cooperation and competition.
Provided minimal insight and examples, explaining how the negotiation contains elements of both cooperation and competition.
Provided little insight and examples, and/or not explaining how the negotiation contains elements of both cooperation and competition.
No submission
Grammar, spelling, and formatting
10%
No or irrelevant grammatical, spelling, or formatting errors.
Few grammatical, spelling, or formatting errors.
Many grammatical, spelling, or formatting errors.
Much of the submission is illegible.
No Submission