2
Community/Functional Mobility Analysis: Trip to the Mall
Name:_____________________
Date: ______________
Course: OTA 104/105: Activity Analysis
Course objective(s):
UNIT SEVEN: Analyzing Human Motion in Daily Activity
Upon successful completion of this unit on written and practical examination, the student will:
Analyze various case examples by:
Identifying physical performance impairments during an occupation.
Selecting appropriate tests to assess the indentified physical performance deficits.
Determining and defending which model of practice/frame of reference would best guide the treatment of the identified impairments.
Implementing the selected frame of reference/model of practice in correcting, or compensating, for the identified impairments.
Curriculum thread(s) addressed:
Occupation centered practice
Role Acquisition
Assignment Objective(s):
The student will demonstrate proficiency in applying Activity Analysis to a wheelchair activity that requires propulsion and mobility throughout a mall or shopping center through understanding the difference between quantitative and qualitative research studies.
Instructions
Student will engage in IADLS:
Shopping
Car transfers
Functional Mobility to include:
Accessing a water fountain
Accessing the elevator
Accessing the restrooms.
Other functional mobility related activities
The students will be assigned the above described functional activity which they will perform resembling a patient with a pre-determined diagnosis and disability.
Students will analyze the functional activity outcome and submit a written assignment (minimum 3-4 pages) utilizing the following structure:
Description of the activity(including listing the most significant steps)
Analysis of client factors and occupational performance skills,
Demands and requirements of the activity,
Environmental and physical context assessment,
List of recommendations that are evidence based; scientific based.
Resources/supplies used to demonstrate skill:
Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (OTPF) to be used as a guide to analyze the foundational elements of task/occupation Performance
Application of concepts previously learned about activity analysis
Criteria
Poor (1)
Fair (2)
Good (3)
Excellent (4)
Use of proper terminology and grammar
Use of inaccurate terminology or grammar on more than 9 occasions.
Use of inaccurate terminology or grammar on no more than 7 occasions.
Good; use of inaccurate terminology or grammar on no more than 5 occasions.
Excellent; use of inaccurate terminology or grammar on no more than 3 occasions.
Organization and structure
Did not follow the structure and organization of paper as recommended at 3 or more times or sections
Fair; however, did not follow the structure and organization of paper as recommended at 2 times or sections
Good; did not follow the structure and organization of paper as recommended at 1 time or section
Excellent; followed the structure and organization of paper as recommended at all times
Accurately completed the section related to the brief description of the activity.
Completed the section 25% accurately with comprehensive information
Completed the section 50% accurately with comprehensive information
Completed the section 75% accurately with comprehensive information
Completed the section 100% accurately with comprehensive information
Accurately completed all sections of the self reflection of the Activity
Did not complete accurately 5-6 questions of the self reflection of the activity
Fair; did not complete accurately 3-4 questions of the self reflection of the activity
Good; did not complete accurately 1-2 questions of the self reflection of the activity
Excellent; completed accurately all sections of the self reflection of the Activity
Identified the most significant and meaningful steps of the activity in a sequential order
Did not identify 5-6 important steps accurately
Fair; did not identify 3-4 important steps accurately
Good; did not identify 1-2 important steps accurately
Excellent; identified all steps accurately
Identify all client factors accurately
Did not complete client factors accurately 5-6 times
Fair; did not complete client factors accurately 3-4 times
Good; did not complete client factors accurately 1-2 times
Excellent; identify all client factors accurately
Identify all client performance skills accurately
Did not identify client’s performance skills accurately 5-6 times
Fair; did not identify client’s performance skills accurately 3-4 times
Good; did not identify client’s performance skills accurately 1-2 times
Excellent; identified all client’s performance skills accurately
Identified the demands and the requirements of the activity accurately
Did not to identify accurately the demands and requirements of performing the activity on 5-6 occasions
Fair; did not identify accurately the demands and requirements of performing the activity on 3-4 occasions
Good; did not identify accurately the demands and requirements of performing the activity on 1-2 occasions
Excellent; identified all the demands and requirements of performing the activity accurately
Identified environmental and physical context assessment accurately
Did not identify the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity on 5-6 occasions accurately
Fair; did not identify accurately the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity on 3-4 occasions
Good; did not identify accurately the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity on 1-2 occasions
Excellent; identified all the environmental and physical context assessment of performing the activity accurately
Completed the list of problems accurately
Did not complete 5-6 problems accurately
Did not complete 3-4 problems accurately
Good; did not complete1-2 problems accurately
Excellent; accurately completed the list of problems
Completed the list of evidence based recommendations accurately
Did not complete or missed 5-6 evidence based recommendations accurately
Fair; did not complete or missed 3-4 evidence based recommendations accurately
Good; did not complete or missed 1-2 evidence based recommendations accurately
Excellent; completed the list of evidence based recommendations accurately
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 25% of the content
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 50% of the content
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 75% of the content
Presented a comprehensive conclusion of the experience 100% of the content
Comment:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Score: The total score to accumulate is “48”. Your score was _____________ with a
percentage of ________________ .
ACOTE Standards for an Accredited Educational Program for the Occupational Therapy Assistant:
(B.1.1., B. 3.2. ,B. 4.3., B.4.4., B.4.9., B.4.10., B.4.14, B.6.2)
Revised 07/13/2020 JM