Review the following article (attached):
Merlin, M. D. (2003). Archaeological evidence for the tradition of psychoactive plant use in the old world. Economic Botany 57 (3), 295–323. doi: 10.1663/0013-0001(2003)057[0295:AEFTTO]2.0.CO;2
Merlin’s (2003) hypothesis is that “humans have a very ancient tradition involving the use of mind-altering experiences to produce profound, more or less spiritual and cultural understanding” (p. 295).
In an essay of 750–1000 words (4–5 pages double-spaced) use one plant presented in this article to argue for or against this hypothesis. To defend your argument, make sure you correctly identify what the archaeological data indicates about past uses of the plant. You must do research to find evidence that contradicts that which is presented in your paper. You also will need to provide the following background information:
The common and scientific names, as well as the family, to which the plant belongs
Its geographic origins, current distribution, and current uses
The chemical nature of the psychoactive principle, and its physiological effects
Be sure that you present the concepts in your own words, and that you include current information. You should follow APA or CSE format for preparing your essay and citing sources.
This essay must be excellent and adhere precisely to the rubric below.
Grading Criteria for Part B: Essay
Following are the grading criteria that will be used to evaluate your essay.
Substance
Criteria
Weighting
The introduction offers a sense of direction for the paper and presents a clear thesis statement to the reader.
/5
The research paper provides evidence of critical thinking and analysis, as well as synthesis of researched information throughout, and presents a logical and persuasive argument.
/10
The body develops the necessary aspects of the main idea and provides examples, support, or illustration for each aspect of the main idea.
/10
The conclusion summarizes the main points and ties them to the thesis; it also presents an impact statement and/or suggests direction for future research.
/5
Total
/30
Writing Style and Format
Criteria
Weighting
Paragraphs are unified, developed, and coherent, with transitions between ideas.
/2
Sentences are grammatically correct; words are chosen for accuracy and impact.
/2
The writing follows the conventions of spelling and mechanics (punctuation, etc.).
/1
The format follows the CSE or APA documentation style accurately and consistently.
/2
Research sources are relevant, current, and credible. At least three sources have been used and are clearly documented in the paper.
/3
Total
/10