Instructions
At the conclusion of Week 6, you will have completed all of the ADPIE steps of program planning. In this assignment, you combine it all into a community plan.
Inclusions:
Introduction
Integrate all previous assignments with revisions if necessary
Definition of Community
Windshield Survey
Community Assessment
Community Partners and Resources Community Health
Diagnosis
Objectives
Identify the intervention activities and resources needed to achieve the objectives and accomplish the goal(s). Describe what you did for your project.
Interventions must be specific and indicate:
Who will implement the intervention?
What, how, and when it will be implemented?
How will people be notified of this?
(Consideration should be given to education space needed, educational materials needing to be developed, advertising, and activity promotion through TV or radio)
Describe the proposed implementation of a project or activity. Include teaching, development of educational materials, etc.
Include in an appendix any material you developed: pamphlets, pictures of posters, advertising material, etc.
Propose an evaluation you would use to measure how you met the stated goal.
How will the success of your interventions be evaluated?
State what you might change to better accomplish the goal if it were not met. As you may remember from care planning, unmet goals usually need a change in interventions, or a change in the goal to be more realistic.
Conclusion
Additional Instructions:
Reference page (minimum of 12 references)
Final Paper 10 – 12 pages (not including title and reference page)
APA format
A title page and a reference page
Please upload your completed assignment to this assignment area. This assignment is due by Sunday at 11:59pm.
Estimated time to complete: 6-8 hours
Rubric
NSG323 Unit 6 Paper Rubric
NSG323 Unit 6 Paper Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
10 pts
Level 5
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.
9 pts
Level 4
Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.
8 pts
Level 3
Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.
7 pts
Level 2
Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.
6 pts
Level 1
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.
0 pts
Level 0
Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
30 pts
Level 5
Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).
27 pts
Level 4
Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.
24 pts
Level 3
Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.
21 pts
Level 2
Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified.
18 pts
Level 1
Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches.
0 pts
Level 0
Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
30 pts
Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
27 pts
Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
24 pts
Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
21 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
18 pts
Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.
0 pts
Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
25 pts
Level 5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
22.5 pts
Level 4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
20 pts
Level 3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
17.5 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.
15 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
15 pts
Level 5
Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.
13.5 pts
Level 4
Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.
12 pts
Level 3
Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.
10.5 pts
Level 2
Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.
9 pts
Level 1
States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.
0 pts
Level 0
States an illogical conclusion from findings.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications
5 pts
Level 5
Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.
4.5 pts
Level 4
Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.
4 pts
Level 3
Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.
3.5 pts
Level 2
Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.
3 pts
Level 1
Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.
0 pts
Level 0
Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
3 pts
Level 5
The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
2.7 pts
Level 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
2.4 pts
Level 3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
2.1 pts
Level 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
1.8 pts
Level 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0 pts
Level 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
2 pts
Level 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
1.8 pts
Level 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
1.6 pts
Level 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
1.4 pts
Level 2
The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
1.2 pts
Level 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.
2 pts