Rubric
Criteria
MAX
MARK
MARK
RECIEVED
Excellent
Good
Reasonable
Fair
Poor/No evidence
(70-100)
(60-69)
(50-59)
(40-49)
(0-40)
Evidence of
30
Outstanding level of
High level of
Reasonable level of
Adequate level of
comprehension of the
relevant theory
Limited (or lacking)
level of
comprehension of
the relevant theory
understanding the
comprehension of the
comprehension of
comprehension of the
relevant theory
relevant theory
the relevant theory
relevant theory
Evidence of
30
Excellent understanding
Convincing
understanding of
the links between
theory and practice
Reasonable
understanding of the links
between theory and
practice
Limited
understanding of the
links between theory
and practice
No evidence of
application of the
of the links between
understanding of
theory to the case
theory and practice
the links between
study
theory and practice
Evidence of analysis
30
Exceptional, reflective,
critical analysis of
issues, convincing
arguments, excellent
discussion
Good analysis of
issues, generally
convincing
arguments
Reasonable analysis of
Poor (or superficial)
No evidence of
of issues related to
issues, relevant but not
analysis of issues,
analysis of issues
the case study
always comprehensive
weak conclusions
arguments
Presentation,
10
Outstanding
presentation, coherent,
logical and structured
answer, excellent
citation accuracy
Good presentation,
well structured
answer, good
citation accuracy
Overall good
presentation, structure,
and citation accuracy but
with lapses
Poor presentation
and structure, limited
attempt to conform
to the requirements
Poor vocabulary
and grammar,
untidy, unedited
Work
structure, and
citation accuracy
100