Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
1
12
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Annotated Bibliography
FirstName LastName
University title
Annotated Bibliography
Jhanjee, S. (2014). Evidence based psychosocial interventions in substance use. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 36(2), 112-118. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.130960
The article focuses on behavioral interventions for substance use disorder. Drug abuse is the fundamental cause of their influence on subjective experience and emotional responses in critical decision-making. It is also an important approach because most addicts are motivated by their reaction to their surroundings. Several publications such as PubMed, Cochrane Database of systemic reviews, and specific journals were used to conduct the research. The methodology was based on utilizing the evidence-based literature which pertains to psychosocial issues in addictive disorders and guidelines on psychological interventions. The scientific basis referenced consisted entirely of published studies or conceptual analyses, which were randomly chosen clinical studies (RCT). These psychosocial interventions enhanced substance use results at the end of the intervention period or follow-up. Abstinence was a significant factor of consideration as it was based on improving the addict’s attitude and behavior towards drug use. The findings indicated a reduction in the rate of drug addiction for alcohol, tobacco, and opioids. They also emphasize the effectiveness of psychological interventions such as cognitive therapy, contingency management, and motivational enhancement.
The article was published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be useful in developing interventions for substance use disorder. Its ability to concentrate on combined therapy methods is significant because it includes adolescent and adult populations. Furthermore, utilizing client sessions for 12 months will be beneficial in designing treatment follow-up.
Silva, T. C., & Andersson, F. B. (2021). The “black box” of treatment: Patients’ perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependence. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 16(1), 1-15. doi:10.1186/s13011-021-00378-7
The research discusses Opioid Maintenance Treatment as a crucial component of pharmacologic treatment for substance use disorder. The initiative entails regularly administering buprenorphine or methadone to drug addicts to improve their opiate addiction recovery. Positive outcomes have been linked to successful therapies in jails, social services, and patient care. The research uses qualitative research design, exploration, and analytical techniques on a convenience sample of drug uses in a Swedish clinical context. It is a significant approach as the research respondents were engaged in a cycle of relapse and treatment for opioids. The findings indicated an increase in motivation and lifestyle changes through the treatment. The capacity of treatment to resolve conditions that lead to addictive behavior, allowing users to maintain their rehabilitation and interpersonal skills, is also a determinant of therapeutic efficacy. The article distinguishes two phases of the intervention in the rehabilitation of substance abuse: conventional treatment and reformative therapy. The framework enables solving any mental and emotional stimuli to opiate misuse, facilitating affirmation before medical treatment.
The article will be useful in developing treatment plans for substance use disorders. Its findings’ ability to incorporate psychological and pharmacological interventions is critical in establishing interpersonal motivation for abstinence. It also emphasizes the significance of social groups like friends and family in maintaining abstinence. It is an aspect that will be critical in implementing treatment in settings, such as prisons, where there is little physician interaction with the participants. As a result, the development will enable a step-by-step analysis of SUD treatment while emphasizing critical aspects such as recidivism and addicts’ transformation to positive lifestyles.
De Andrade, D., Ritchie, J., Rowlands, M., Mann, E., & Hides, L. (2018). Substance use and recidivism outcomes for prison-based drug and alcohol interventions. Epidemiologic Reviews, 40(1), 121-133. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxy004
The article aims to assess the efficacy of previous research and determine the best alcohol and other drug therapeutic interventions for prison inmates. The research was conducted through the assessments of substance use disorder treatment in prisons publications authored between 1995 and 2015. The research determined which types of detention center addiction therapies have the most support for their efficacy based on diligently reasonable evaluations. The journal recognition criteria included the gender of the study cohort, rehabilitation methods, intervention timeline, and assessment of different initiatives. The findings indicate that psychological therapies are efficacious in decreasing reoffending and drug use following release to a smaller extent. There is also substantiation that opioid maintenance treatment efficiently reduces opiate users’ risk of resuming substance use after release from custody. For long-term sustenance, the article indicated the combination of pharmacological and psychological interventions for SUD.
The article is a peer-reviewed journal and will be essential in developing treatment programs for short-term and long-term initiatives. It is critical as the authors incorporate social and individual issues by focusing on prisoners in the follow-up period after release. Additionally, it provides a critical link between SUD and negative behavior, such as crime. It is a substantial line of research that highlights the effectiveness of different treatment approaches. It forms a quality assessment basis for long-term abstinence sustenance for individuals affected by SUD.
Doyle, M. F., Shakeshaft, A., Guthrie, J., Snijder, M., & Butler, T. (2019). A systematic review of evaluations of prison‐based alcohol and other drug use behavioural treatment for men. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 43(2), 120-130. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12884
The article aims to conduct a review of all studies conducted since 2000 that looked at the drug use and recidivism repercussions of prison-based drug dependency treatments. The researchers’ goals are to evaluate the thorough overview’s research results and determine an optimal therapeutic approach for the concerned prisoners. The research was conducted through online research in various articles published databases, including Medline and other detention centers and health-related webpages. To assess the reliability and research results of the analyses, an econometric analysis tool was used. It incorporated a performance analysis of the significance of the articles and affiliated authors. The author’s findings indicate that psychological and medically-based SUD therapies in prison are effective. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, on the other hand, would be ineffective if used alone. It also indicates that inmates who received the treatments had a lower recidivism rate.
The article will be useful in establishing the psychological treatment of SUD. Its research design is essential as it incorporates evidence-based studies focusing on the quality of SUD treatment for different populations. Additionally, its ability to focus on prisoners offers a substantial emphasis on the role of social and individual influence on treatment programs. It also offers insight into race and ethnicity and their role in the increased substance. It is a substantial approach that affects the effectiveness of treatment across diverse populations.
Dunlop, A. J., White, B., Roberts, J., Cretikos, M., Attalla, D., Ling, R., … Lintzeris, N. (2020). Treatment of opioid dependence with depot buprenorphine (CAM2038) in custodial settings is safe, effective and cost-effective. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3720723
The researcher aims to explore how well subcutaneous steady depot buprenorphine works for opioid addicts in prisons. It is a significant approach in determining any unexpected side effects or bioactivity issues with depot buprenorphine. The analysis was open and non-random, with the respondents receiving two different types of buprenorphine. Incarceration staff identified respondents by excluding pregnant prisoners or had other pre-existing conditions. The respondents received a weekly dose of buprenorphine, followed by three once-month infusions of a streamlined dosage. The findings indicated that participants who underwent the treatment had a high retention rate with a minimized intake of opioids with no medical diversions. They also indicated that many patients take several weeks or even months to sustain in therapies, highlighting the significance of offering adherence to healthcare for those with opioid use disorder who are not already on rehabilitation at the time of their arrest.
The article is from a peer-reviewed journal and is essential in establishing the basis for pharmacotherapy for SUD treatment. The ability of the authors to focus on the oral and injectable depots of buprenorphine offers insight into the safety of the treatment initiative with long-term abstinence sustenance. Additionally, the standardized administration of the buprenorphine offers a systematic insight into the consistency required for effectiveness in pharmacological interventions.
Ray, L. A., Meredith, L. R., Kiluk, B. D., Walthers, J., Carroll, K. M., & Magill, M. (2020). Combined pharmacotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with alcohol or substance use disorders. JAMA Network Open, 3(6), e208279. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8279
The researchers’ SUD analysis relies on cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacologic treatments. Their configuration was primarily based on alcoholism. The method is more effective than long-term treatment with prescription medications. Other psychological interventions, such as the 12-step program, must be included to stabilize pharmacologic treatments for substance use disorder, as this increases the likelihood of successful treatment. Because cognitive behavioral therapy does not subsidize or implement sobriety on its own, it is a necessary foundation for the author’s analyses. As a result, the substantial proof recommendation will be confined to a single rehabilitation, whether clinical or behavioral, rather than a combination of techniques. Additionally, the results emphasized cognitive therapy to ensure that the respondents retain their sobriety even without pharmacotherapy.
The article will be influential in offering an evidence-based approach to developing treatment programs through the combination of psychological and pharmacological interventions. This is through the study’s ability to analyze different contrast treatments, emphasizing their effectiveness. The standardized design is also diversified across numerous substance use disorders, therefore, offering heterogeneity into the effectiveness of treatment.
Carver, H., Ring, N., Miler, J., & Parkes, T. (2020). What constitutes effective problematic substance use treatment from the perspective of homeless people? A systematic review and meta-ethnography. Harm Reduction Journal, 17(1), 1-22. doi:10.1186/s12954-020-0356-9
The article explores substance use disorder treatment by focusing on homeless individuals. The research focuses on different homeless intervention programs across various countries. The approach explores the needs of homeless people and their significant contribution towards affecting abstinence and retention of treatment. The findings indicate that how operations and rehabilitation are provided is more essential than the treatment offered. The authors emphasize that intervention programs should prioritize relationships between staff and addicts, person-centered perspectives, and a profound understanding of persons’ intricate lives. In addition, prevention strategies and abstinence-based treatments were reported as effective in treating addiction. It is through participants’ preference to programs where they could set personalized goals over having to establish and maintain abstinence.
The article is from an evidence-based journal and offers insight into the motivation and perspectives of drug users as they seek treatment. It is a significant approach that influences rehabilitation and the effectiveness of different interventions. It is a unique framework that incorporates the emotional aspect of social interactions. The line of research is significant as most treatment approaches neglect the addict’s social environment and perspective. In addition, the article highlights the aspect of mental disorders among SUD in homeless persons. It is a significant highlight that will form the basis for future research on coping mechanisms and professional care access.
Magwood, O., Salvalaggio, G., Beder, M., Kendall, C., Kpade, V., Daghmach, W., … Pottie, K. (2020). The effectiveness of substance use interventions for homeless and vulnerably housed persons: A systematic review of systematic reviews on supervised consumption facilities, managed alcohol programs, and pharmacological agents for opioid use disorder. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0227298. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227298
The article aims at exploring SUD treatment for individuals with vulnerable housing. The research is conducted by examining evidence-based publications that focus on rehabilitation and pharmacologic therapy for substance users’ healthcare and personal well-being, emphasizing homeless persons. It is a qualitative approach to treatment as it influences the quality of intervention programs. The findings indicate that effective pharmacological interventions incorporate methadone, buprenorphine, diacetylmorphine, and hydromorphone for opioid addiction. The efficacy of the intervention is based on the reduction of medical complications and morbidity to diseases such as Hepatitis and HIV. It is critical in improving the social functioning, physical, and mental health of homeless addicts. Additionally, the authors emphasized the need for supervised consumption facilities to ensure that homeless individuals are alienated from negative stimuli. It is an integral aspect in promoting stability in alcohol addiction treatment programs.
The article is useful in highlighting the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for substance use disorder. Its ability to offer alternatives for methadone and buprenorphine is essential in supplementing vulnerable populations without access to quality care. In addition, it offers statistical support for the need for treatment initiatives through the focus on risk factors. It is a vital approach essential in influencing social and individual support for treatment programs.
Tsai, J., & Gu, X. (2019). Utilization of addiction treatment among U.S. adults with history of incarceration and substance use disorders. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 14(1), 1-9. doi:10.1186/s13722-019-0138-4
The purpose of this article is to compare the percentage of individuals with a history of detainment who received SUD treatment to those who did not. It is an integrated approach that addresses the factors that influence the incorporation of SUD treatments in adults with a history of detainment. The respondents for the study were identified using the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. The participants were then arbitrarily chosen for the survey method. Direct interviews were used to gather individual data, incarceration specifications, and drug use information. The information analyzed includes rehabilitation and moral support features associated with SUD intervention and incarceration. Individuals with drug use and detainment records tend to use SUD treatments than their peers with SUDs but no incarceration histories. It allowed the authors to highlight the barriers to accessing SUD treatment among vulnerable populations, thereby needing public health interventions.
The interviewing and recruiting methodologies used in the study are critical because they allow for a comparison of preferences among people with SUD. It also allows for social and interpersonal factors like homelessness and moral support. It is important for future research because it focuses on self-help groups among people with SUD and incarceration.
Blonigen, D. M., Finney, J. W., Wilbourne, P. L., & Moos, R. H. (2015). Psychosocial treatments for substance use disorders. Oxford Clinical Psychology, 731–761. doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780199342211.003.0023
The article focuses on psychotherapies in the treatment of SUD in prisoners. For effective treatment, the approach combines the psychological and social invasion methodologies. The research findings focus on the various effective interventions for behavior regulation. The structure of psychosocial interventions focuses primarily on a personalized environment that provides drug users to develop dynamic behaviors that help them maintain their abstinence. The article emphasizes effective psychological treatments such as behavioral interventions, motivational enhancement therapy, contingency management, and 12-Step facilitation. They are significant as they focus on the interpersonal and social relationships between service users and therapists. Additionally, the article emphasizes that brief interventions are extremely effective in treating alcoholism. They are, however, best suited as stand-alone treatments for individuals with mild alcohol use difficulties. It is a significant approach that allows therapists to develop empathic and conciliatory skills to create a strong supportive environment. The study’s findings indicate that using a combination of methods can keep patients in rehabilitation while reducing unauthorized drug use, negative impacts, and death rates. It influences the success of treatment as addicts to achieve better outcomes.
The article is from an evidence-based journal and offers qualitative support for psychological treatment for substance use disorder. It will be possible to lay the groundwork for social and psychological treatments by utilizing personalized and collective methodologies in their psychotherapy. It will be a practical approach to assisting drug users in abstaining and developing coping skills. The article addressed substance use, laying the foundation for future research on treatment methods design. Additionally, the authors have technical knowledge of psychological interventions, allowing them to confront the delicate issue rationally. The research methodology is free of arithmetical errors as it is built to accommodate inferences from data in research and psychology.
References
Blonigen, D. M., Finney, J. W., Wilbourne, P. L., & Moos, R. H. (2015). Psychosocial treatments for substance use disorders. Oxford Clinical Psychology, 731–761. doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780199342211.003.0023
Carver, H., Ring, N., Miler, J., & Parkes, T. (2020). What constitutes effective problematic substance use treatment from the perspective of people who are homeless? A systematic review and meta-ethnography. Harm Reduction Journal, 17(1), 1-22. doi:10.1186/s12954-020-0356-9
De Andrade, D., Ritchie, J., Rowlands, M., Mann, E., & Hides, L. (2018). Substance use and recidivism outcomes for prison-based drug and alcohol interventions. Epidemiologic Reviews, 40(1), 121-133. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxy004
Doyle, M. F., Shakeshaft, A., Guthrie, J., Snijder, M., & Butler, T. (2019). A systematic review of evaluations of prison‐based alcohol and other drug use behavioural treatment for men. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 43(2), 120-130. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12884
Dunlop, A. J., White, B., Roberts, J., Cretikos, M., Attalla, D., Ling, R., … Lintzeris, N. (2020). Treatment of opioid dependence with depot buprenorphine (CAM2038) in custodial settings is safe, effective and cost-effective. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3720723
Jhanjee, S. (2014). Evidence based psychosocial interventions in substance use. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 36(2), 112-118. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.130960
Magwood, O., Salvalaggio, G., Beder, M., Kendall, C., Kpade, V., Daghmach, W., … Pottie, K. (2020). The effectiveness of substance use interventions for homeless and vulnerably housed persons: A systematic review of systematic reviews on supervised consumption facilities, managed alcohol programs, and pharmacological agents for opioid use disorder. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0227298. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227298
Silva, T. C., & Andersson, F. B. (2021). The “black box” of treatment: Patients’ perspective on what works in opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependence. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 16(1), 1-15. doi:10.1186/s13011-021-00378-7
Tsai, J., & Gu, X. (2019). Utilization of addiction treatment among U.S. adults with history of incarceration and substance use disorders. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 14(1), 1-9. doi:10.1186/s13722-019-0138-4
Ray, L. A., Meredith, L. R., Kiluk, B. D., Walthers, J., Carroll, K. M., & Magill, M. (2020). Combined pharmacotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with alcohol or substance use disorders. JAMA Network Open, 3(6), e208279. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8279